Cougar/Frog
Active Member
What's frustrating is the fact that margin of victory is not taken into account in the computers. The system really is rigged against non-AQ teams.... they count our strength of schedule against us in their formulas, but they don't allow us to make up for our "lesser" schedules by beating the crap out of the supposeduly lesser teams.
How anyone can think that "how a team actually performed in the game" shouldn't be a variable taken into account is beyond me.
This is by design, my friend. The Big Ten and SEC are known for low-scoring defensive matchups (even if was more like crappy offenses and this season for crappy defenses). By removing MoV (even one where you get no benefit after 25 or 30 points like Sagarin used to do), it allows teams that squeak by bad teams (LSU, OU) to jump to the top of the polls based on arcane and convoluted scheduling criteria (which rarely include anything with regards to home/road issues, which is really bad with so many AQ teams having only 3 or 4 road games, they get a huge boost as lose on the road at a much higher rate than at home or neutral sites ---see Wisconsin vs. Ohio State).
The current system is ultimately designed to match up team teams from the Big 12, Big Ten, and SEC, with a rare intervening team from the other AQ conferences. Remember, Oregon as well as USC have been kept out of the BCS title game, while LSU and Florida have backed into (as has Ohio State, OU, etc.).