Fan Nation
Forums
Forum list
Search forums
Rules & Policies
Podcast
Mobile App
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Shop
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Horned Frog Athletics
Scott & Wes Frog Fan Forum
#BAYLORTEARS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NNM" data-source="post: 2384893" data-attributes="member: 1772"><p>Here's the opinion: <a href="http://www.search.txcourts.gov/SearchMedia.aspx?MediaVersionID=fcd6e11e-e393-4bca-b9a0-5af15d3f663e&MediaID=28bfe4bb-2dc4-420c-a09d-9ca2d68c5511&coa=%22%20+%20this.CurrentWebState.CurrentCourt%20+%20@%22&DT=Opinion" target="_blank">http://www.search.txcourts.gov/SearchMedia.aspx?MediaVersionID=fcd6e11e-e393-4bca-b9a0-5af15d3f663e&MediaID=28bfe4bb-2dc4-420c-a09d-9ca2d68c5511&coa=" + this.CurrentWebState.CurrentCourt + @"&DT=Opinion</a></p><p></p><p>(Not sure the link will work)</p><p></p><p>The only basis upon which the case was reversed was that the trial court erred by admitting a string of text messages between the victim and her friend which immediately preceded the offense. Although the trial court excluded them because it found that it was prejudicial to the victim in referencing prior sexual conduct, the appeals court found that the messages should have been admitted because they were relevant to the issue of consent, and did not paint the victim in a negative light.</p><p></p><p>The trial court did admit messages between the victim and her friend immediately AFTER the offense, in which the victim said that SamU "basically raped her."</p><p></p><p>The other issues that SamU raised in his appeal were not reached because the case was reversed. The only other issue that the court ruled on was whether the indictment should have been dismissed entirely. That issue went against SamU.</p><p></p><p>So the result is a full new trial, in which the full text message string will be introduced. It still seems like a massive gamble on SamU's part. He has a lot more to lose, and the general court of public opinion is pretty poisoned against him now. Although the Briles idolaters still exist, particularly in Waco, a lot more people have seen the light.</p><p></p><p>At a minimum, it ensures continued focus on the cesspool in Waco. And this time the trial will not fly under the radar the way it did (by design) the first time around.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NNM, post: 2384893, member: 1772"] Here's the opinion: [URL='http://www.search.txcourts.gov/SearchMedia.aspx?MediaVersionID=fcd6e11e-e393-4bca-b9a0-5af15d3f663e&MediaID=28bfe4bb-2dc4-420c-a09d-9ca2d68c5511&coa=%22%20+%20this.CurrentWebState.CurrentCourt%20+%20@%22&DT=Opinion']http://www.search.txcourts.gov/SearchMedia.aspx?MediaVersionID=fcd6e11e-e393-4bca-b9a0-5af15d3f663e&MediaID=28bfe4bb-2dc4-420c-a09d-9ca2d68c5511&coa=" + this.CurrentWebState.CurrentCourt + @"&DT=Opinion[/URL] (Not sure the link will work) The only basis upon which the case was reversed was that the trial court erred by admitting a string of text messages between the victim and her friend which immediately preceded the offense. Although the trial court excluded them because it found that it was prejudicial to the victim in referencing prior sexual conduct, the appeals court found that the messages should have been admitted because they were relevant to the issue of consent, and did not paint the victim in a negative light. The trial court did admit messages between the victim and her friend immediately AFTER the offense, in which the victim said that SamU "basically raped her." The other issues that SamU raised in his appeal were not reached because the case was reversed. The only other issue that the court ruled on was whether the indictment should have been dismissed entirely. That issue went against SamU. So the result is a full new trial, in which the full text message string will be introduced. It still seems like a massive gamble on SamU's part. He has a lot more to lose, and the general court of public opinion is pretty poisoned against him now. Although the Briles idolaters still exist, particularly in Waco, a lot more people have seen the light. At a minimum, it ensures continued focus on the cesspool in Waco. And this time the trial will not fly under the radar the way it did (by design) the first time around. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Which team did TCU defeat in the College Football Playoffs?
Post reply
Forums
Horned Frog Athletics
Scott & Wes Frog Fan Forum
#BAYLORTEARS
Top