ticketfrog123
Active Member
Won’t be an ACC soon. ND has to make a decision soon which will force FSU + Clemson into SEC. VT, UNC and other desirable schools will ditch soon after.Just be better than the ACC...
Won’t be an ACC soon. ND has to make a decision soon which will force FSU + Clemson into SEC. VT, UNC and other desirable schools will ditch soon after.Just be better than the ACC...
2 additional from PAC 12 if you can get 2 from UW, Oregon, Stanford. Then wait for ACC to crumble and take best remaining 2-4 to reach 20-22
I guess the Pac 12's snobby attitude of hardly anyone being good enough to be allowed in their conference has bitten them in the rear.
Heh. And, how we listened to them snobbishly dump on us for years about our poor academics and backward customs... "Those whom Gods destroy..."I'm gonna love watching the squirm to keep the Pac name. Stanford, Cal, OSU and WSU begging SDSU, UNLV, Boise and CSU to come on board and then figuring out another 2-4 to 10 or 12.
We stop at 18 or 20. Schedules get terrible after that. Play your division + X number of games against teams from other division.
1 OOC game per year + Big 12 title game at Cowboys
For this reason, I think we only take 2 teams from PAC 12 and wait for ACC. Oregon and Utah are first choice.
Interest in UW or Colorado is minimal - extra hate for Colorado since they left the Big 12 already
Won’t be an ACC soon. ND has to make a decision soon which will force FSU + Clemson into SEC. VT, UNC and other desirable schools will ditch soon after.
Do you have a time machine?I would rather add Utah than BYU.
What do the networks think?I would rather add Utah than BYU.
Regarding BYU and Utah, would they want Cal and Stanford in conference to play in Calif every year? For recruiting.What do the networks think?
Really couldn't ever see Stanford or Cal wanting any part of your scenario to keep the PAC name... they'll be on their knees to the B12... and if that doesn't occur, then fold football, which would be sad.I'm gonna love watching the squirm to keep the Pac name. Stanford, Cal, OSU and WSU begging SDSU, UNLV, Boise and CSU to come on board and then figuring out another 2-4 to 10 or 12.
It just matters more.Really couldn't ever see Stanford or Cal wanting any part of your scenario to keep the PAC name... they'll be on their knees to the B12... and if that doesn't occur, then fold football, which would be sad.
I heard a report that the legislatures in Washington and Oregon said U can’t go without state.
Really couldn't ever see Stanford or Cal wanting any part of your scenario to keep the PAC name... they'll be on their knees to the B12... and if that doesn't occur, then fold football, which would be sad.
Not really. ACC is worthless when Clemson and FSU bolt. It’s a matter of time - their boards have been complaining about subsidizing Syracuse and Wake for yearsBig assumptions here - ie that there would be enough slots for ACC schools to go. More likely they’ll be backfilling if they lose any.
Not the biggest fan of Colorado either, but the reason they left the Big 12 is headed to the SECWe stop at 18 or 20. Schedules get terrible after that. Play your division + X number of games against teams from other division.
1 OOC game per year + Big 12 title game at Cowboys
For this reason, I think we only take 2 teams from PAC 12 and wait for ACC. Oregon and Utah are first choice.
Interest in UW or Colorado is minimal - extra hate for Colorado since they left the Big 12 already
Amazing the teams you can attract when UT is NOT in your conference.Not the biggest fan of Colorado either, but the reason they left the Big 12 is headed to the SEC