Limp Lizard
Full Member
Lots of "young" Texas team, blah, blah on the telecast Thursday. Not much about TCU. Looking at the depth charts, TCU and Texas are close on offense (65.5% fr, RSfr or sophs for TCU, 63.9% for Texas), TCU much younger on defense (85.2% vs. 60%).
Looking at just last 4 years, the Rivals list: TCU 86 recruits, 5*=0, 4*=11. Texas 95 recruits, 5*=8, 4*=59. So we like to downplay the stars, lets say all of TCU's were rated correctly, half of Texas' were grossly overrated: TCU 5*=0, 4*=11; Texas 5*=4, 4*=29. Doesn't add up, does it. Of course, Texas is not all that young by TCU standards this year, just the media cannot say "Texas team" without adding "young" before "Texas team." This of course does not count 5th year Seniors, either. One thing is Texas has more attrition. But beyond that?
I'm hoping they keep Mack in Austin, guys. For a long time. I'm sure he is playing the "young" card this year. Ever notice how bad (or in Texas' case, underachieving) programs keep having a young team? That was true at TCU during many of the bad years including Sullivan's tenure.
Looking at just last 4 years, the Rivals list: TCU 86 recruits, 5*=0, 4*=11. Texas 95 recruits, 5*=8, 4*=59. So we like to downplay the stars, lets say all of TCU's were rated correctly, half of Texas' were grossly overrated: TCU 5*=0, 4*=11; Texas 5*=4, 4*=29. Doesn't add up, does it. Of course, Texas is not all that young by TCU standards this year, just the media cannot say "Texas team" without adding "young" before "Texas team." This of course does not count 5th year Seniors, either. One thing is Texas has more attrition. But beyond that?
I'm hoping they keep Mack in Austin, guys. For a long time. I'm sure he is playing the "young" card this year. Ever notice how bad (or in Texas' case, underachieving) programs keep having a young team? That was true at TCU during many of the bad years including Sullivan's tenure.

