Travis Trucks
Active Member
CFN thinks Briles did. http://cfn.scout.com/2/557654.html
And I am sure Baylor fans think so too.
But I disagree that Art Briles had a better coaching year.
I know he had to replace a Heisman winner, but the guy who replaced him had plenty of experience and the rest of the team was still pretty experienced, ranking 28th nationally in effective experience: http://www.cfbsheets.com/2012/Baylor.html - So the team was still pretty much in tact from last year
Gary Patterson, on the other hand. We all know the story here, offseason, injuries, having to resort to a former walk on running back at starting middle line backer and so on. We ranked 121st nationally in effective experience: http://www.cfbsheets.com/2012/TCU.html
Both Briles and Patterson had the same records, both overall and in conference. But the big difference is that Patterson beat Briles by 28 points in Briles' building, so that should be the tie breaker in who had the better year of coaching.
And I am sure Baylor fans think so too.
But I disagree that Art Briles had a better coaching year.
I know he had to replace a Heisman winner, but the guy who replaced him had plenty of experience and the rest of the team was still pretty experienced, ranking 28th nationally in effective experience: http://www.cfbsheets.com/2012/Baylor.html - So the team was still pretty much in tact from last year
Gary Patterson, on the other hand. We all know the story here, offseason, injuries, having to resort to a former walk on running back at starting middle line backer and so on. We ranked 121st nationally in effective experience: http://www.cfbsheets.com/2012/TCU.html
Both Briles and Patterson had the same records, both overall and in conference. But the big difference is that Patterson beat Briles by 28 points in Briles' building, so that should be the tie breaker in who had the better year of coaching.

