Fan Nation
Forums
Forum list
Search forums
Rules & Policies
Podcast
Mobile App
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Shop
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Horned Frog Athletics
Scott & Wes Frog Fan Forum
Transformation Committee runs out of time!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Nick Danger" data-source="post: 3160848" data-attributes="member: 33407"><p>Below is a link to a lengthy Dennis Dodd article from early May that encapsulates all the problems facing the NCAA and their committee to Transform the NCAA, most notably the NIL issue. Towards the very end of the article he also addresses the issue of separating the current FBS schools into two separate sub-divisions (the Haves and the Have-Nots) with the higher "Have" Division being run by some new College Football Playoff organization geared towards football, while the lesser FBS schools will remain in a NCAA-run system. </p><p></p><p>The article mentions that the criteria being considered to determine which schools make the cut, and which ones don't, will be kept simple, and involve setting a <em><strong>minimum number of sports teams</strong></em> (Men and Women) that the "Have" Division schools must sponsor in order to be in the top tier CFP Division. The number being thrown around right now is a minimum of 20 teams, up from 16, with the thought being that that will create financial barriers, for many of the lesser schools, too great to bear, thereby shunting them (against their will) into the lesser NCAA-run Division.</p><p></p><p>But here's an interesting factoid about this potential development. After a <em>cursor</em>y review (so I could be mis-reading the info) of the number of sports teams each of the current and future Big-12 teams sponsor,<em> only one current and future Big-12 school (other than OU and UT) sponsors enough teams to meet the new, anticipated criteria</em>, and guess who that is! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /> <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite6" alt=":cool:" title="Cool :cool:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":cool:" /></p><p></p><p><a href="https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/ncaa-unlikely-to-meet-constitution-deadline-as-hot-button-nil-issue-disrupts-college-athletics/" target="_blank">Dennis Dodd article!</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Nick Danger, post: 3160848, member: 33407"] Below is a link to a lengthy Dennis Dodd article from early May that encapsulates all the problems facing the NCAA and their committee to Transform the NCAA, most notably the NIL issue. Towards the very end of the article he also addresses the issue of separating the current FBS schools into two separate sub-divisions (the Haves and the Have-Nots) with the higher "Have" Division being run by some new College Football Playoff organization geared towards football, while the lesser FBS schools will remain in a NCAA-run system. The article mentions that the criteria being considered to determine which schools make the cut, and which ones don't, will be kept simple, and involve setting a [I][B]minimum number of sports teams[/B][/I] (Men and Women) that the "Have" Division schools must sponsor in order to be in the top tier CFP Division. The number being thrown around right now is a minimum of 20 teams, up from 16, with the thought being that that will create financial barriers, for many of the lesser schools, too great to bear, thereby shunting them (against their will) into the lesser NCAA-run Division. But here's an interesting factoid about this potential development. After a [I]cursor[/I]y review (so I could be mis-reading the info) of the number of sports teams each of the current and future Big-12 teams sponsor,[I] only one current and future Big-12 school (other than OU and UT) sponsors enough teams to meet the new, anticipated criteria[/I], and guess who that is! :D :cool: [URL='https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/ncaa-unlikely-to-meet-constitution-deadline-as-hot-button-nil-issue-disrupts-college-athletics/']Dennis Dodd article![/URL] [/QUOTE]
Verification
Which team did TCU defeat in the College Football Playoffs?
Post reply
Forums
Horned Frog Athletics
Scott & Wes Frog Fan Forum
Transformation Committee runs out of time!
Top