too good to be true:
- Thread starter fdub
- Start date
D
Daniel Plainview
Guest
QUOTE(tcugdu @ Jun 15 2010, 01:41 PM) [snapback]579939[/snapback]
great thread!
was that a rick roll?
great thread!
was that a rick roll?
http://blogs.sltrib.com/utes/index.php?p=1...p;tb=1&pb=1
QUOTE
A few rumors are out that Utah has officially notified the MWC it is leaving the league. Those rumors are unfounded according to MWC and Utah officials.
QUOTE
A few rumors are out that Utah has officially notified the MWC it is leaving the league. Those rumors are unfounded according to MWC and Utah officials.
I really think Pac 10 schools may not be willing to risk bringing Utah in with possibility that they could win a Pac 12 football title in the first few years, but there's lots of factors at play here.
Plus, as I heard elsewhere, Pac 10 doesn't need to invite Utah for another year to have them join when CU does.
Plus, as I heard elsewhere, Pac 10 doesn't need to invite Utah for another year to have them join when CU does.
HFrog1999
Member
Take it for what it's worth. Utah claims no contact. Is Franchione their new SID?
Utah not contacted by Pac-10
Utah not contacted by Pac-10
Frognosticator
Tier 1
It doesn't make any sense for Utah to leave now. The MWC is an up and rising conference, especially with Boise in it.
We're going to be auto-bid, guys. And there ain't nutin' UT or its syncophants can do about it.
We're going to be auto-bid, guys. And there ain't nutin' UT or its syncophants can do about it.
macaroni
Member
QUOTE(Frognosticator @ Jun 15 2010, 01:49 PM) [snapback]580089[/snapback]
It doesn't make any sense for Utah to leave now. The MWC is an up and rising conference, especially with Boise in it.
We're going to be auto-bid, guys. And there ain't nutin' UT or its syncophants can do about it.
Oh, they will leave if invited, but it is probably really smart for the Pac10 to take a breather after the craziness that went down and look at all their options. One of those options is staying at 11. You gotta wonder how much confidence those university presidents have in their zealous commish right now.
It doesn't make any sense for Utah to leave now. The MWC is an up and rising conference, especially with Boise in it.
We're going to be auto-bid, guys. And there ain't nutin' UT or its syncophants can do about it.
Oh, they will leave if invited, but it is probably really smart for the Pac10 to take a breather after the craziness that went down and look at all their options. One of those options is staying at 11. You gotta wonder how much confidence those university presidents have in their zealous commish right now.
gdu
Active Member
QUOTE(Frognosticator @ Jun 15 2010, 02:49 PM) [snapback]580089[/snapback]
It doesn't make any sense for Utah to leave now. The MWC is an up and rising conference, especially with Boise in it.
Sure it does. It makes dollars and sense. Way more money. Way more exposure. Still a pretty easy league to win. More respect.
It doesn't make any sense for Utah to leave now. The MWC is an up and rising conference, especially with Boise in it.
Sure it does. It makes dollars and sense. Way more money. Way more exposure. Still a pretty easy league to win. More respect.
Merch Frog
Turd
QUOTE(FriskyFrog @ Jun 15 2010, 08:16 PM) [snapback]580118[/snapback]
Oh, they will leave if invited, but it is probably really smart for the Pac10 to take a breather after the craziness that went down and look at all their options. One of those options is staying at 11. You gotta wonder how much confidence those university presidents have in their zealous commish right now.
+1
Oh, they will leave if invited, but it is probably really smart for the Pac10 to take a breather after the craziness that went down and look at all their options. One of those options is staying at 11. You gotta wonder how much confidence those university presidents have in their zealous commish right now.
+1
