froggolf65
Active Member
That's why you foul with 30 secs left and extend the game.
That’s the play we’re gonna lose on?
He traveled dude. This is a low IQ team and it’s starts from the top.Truly pathetic to make that call at the end of the game
That's why you foul with 30 secs left and extend the game.
Would you rather have 1 chance with 6 secs or multiple possessions? I dont see us getting many good shots in 6 secs especially when Nembhard is our go to guy.After being down by 10 in the 2nd and having the ball with 6 seconds and down by 1....I think what CJD decided was right. Had the best chance to win and walked instead.
Why do all of our coaches have horrific clock mgmnt skills?
Would you rather have 1 chance with 6 secs or multiple possessions? I dont see us getting many good shots in 6 secs especially when Nembhard is our go to guy.
The way this team plays I’ll take one possession to win. There was nothing in this game that I saw to convince me that we were going to beat them at a possession game. And RJ has hit big shots this season. The sad part is that the best player isn’t an option
I don't buy that the best player isn't an option right there. That last play was totally up to Dixon on who had the ball. We can all agree that Bane is often too passive but with 6 seconds left then I'd rather him have the ball instead of someone who struggles to dribble in the open floor. RJ was hot at the end in the halfcourt offense but having him dribble 75 feet to the basket seems very low percentage.The way this team plays I’ll take one possession to win. There was nothing in this game that I saw to convince me that we were going to beat them at a possession game. And RJ has hit big shots this season. The sad part is that the best player isn’t an option
I blame ESPN +.
Yeah darn that guy.I blame CDC
This one is 100% on Jamie. I hope he admits it.
Not gonna win many Big 12 games where RJ leads the team in minutes and FGA. Also, not gonna win many with Ed on the floor 27 mins.
Maybe Eight won't accuse me of being a sunshine pumper again.
I just like being contrary.Serious question. Is it a money thing or just a boycott on principle?
Also on the last play, why is Samuel even on the floor? He's the one setting the screen but since he's no threat as a shooter then his defender can play 5 feet off him and basically negate the screen. If you have a shooting threat set the screen then it's a much more difficult decision for the defense.
Just my opinion. I'm not super knowledgeable in basketball X's and O's.