Is this Fake News or the real deal?This is getting petty.
Is this Fake News or the real deal?This is getting petty.
What is the over/under on live tweets from the stands?The Organizers in Ireland have pulled his press credentials. He’s welcome to sit in the stands with the fans but no press access.
Not getting a lot of friendly looks, lol
Well, there is this part, which was out there and the Star Telegram finally reported on the 21st. Seems like there should have been better vetting in this story.I'm genuinely interested in some additional perspective from those who think that TCU screwed up here, and I'm wondering if I'm missing any material facts. As I understand it:
Fields assaulted player B in the locker room and sent him to the hospital.
TCU kicked Fields off of the team for his actions.
An unidentified person connected to Fields contacted the Star Telegram, stating that Fields was bullied and somehow else mistreated, which potentially pointed some blame at player B. The paper ran with the story, likely approaching the school for information (TCU declined comment).
Player B separately identified himself as Ezukanma, and then received some harassment and threats.
The paper tried to reduce its blame by saying they hadn't identified player B (Personally I think this is silly because it wouldn't be difficult for people to figure out who was at practice on the day of the assault and then missing the next day).
Are any of those statements incorrect? Is there more background I'm missing?
To me, the paper made a grievous mistake by publishing ANY of the information provided by the source. SJ wrote it and at least one editor approved it. It seems crazy to publish the assailant's side at all and even worse from a second hand source. Another source, within a couple days, refuted what the first source said.
I understand someone thinking that TCU went too strong on revoking credentials but when a reporter publishes the offender's version of an assault that seems very irresponsible and potentially dangerous.
Again - would love to hear if I am missing something.
BTW: This was a timely post a moment ago and relevant:
Both great posts. I think we should start a poll. Huh huh, I said pole!It's officially a tie as to who won KF.c today. Congrats.
racist!Some of them. With the whole FWISD brouhaha, somehow all teachers are completely innocent. Well, my son goes to school across the street in one of the so-called best elementary schools in the district and I've got some strong opinions about some of the teachers he's had over the last 5 years. Any slight objection to anything and I'm force fielded by their whoa is me theatrics. I can't question anything and it has gotten exhausting. In 3rd grade the teacher said my son was displaying signs of toxic masculinity and said he should act more like a certain effiminate boy who's parents let him wear high-heeled boots to school.
Well stated. A little more background. Another TCU sports forum had Dozie identified within hours of the SJ article. With all of his resources, SJ couldn't do the same thing and instead chose to go with the unsubstantiated bullship that he did. Lazy and pathetic reporting.I'm genuinely interested in some additional perspective from those who think that TCU screwed up here, and I'm wondering if I'm missing any material facts. As I understand it:
Fields assaulted player B in the locker room and sent him to the hospital.
TCU kicked Fields off of the team for his actions.
An unidentified person connected to Fields contacted the Star Telegram, stating that Fields was bullied and somehow else mistreated, which potentially pointed some blame at player B. The paper ran with the story, likely approaching the school for information (TCU declined comment).
Player B separately identified himself as Ezukanma, and then received some harassment and threats.
The paper tried to reduce its blame by saying they hadn't identified player B (Personally I think this is silly because it wouldn't be difficult for people to figure out who was at practice on the day of the assault and then missing the next day).
Are any of those statements incorrect? Is there more background I'm missing?
To me, the paper made a grievous mistake by publishing ANY of the information provided by the source. SJ wrote it and at least one editor approved it. It seems crazy to publish the assailant's side at all and even worse from a second hand source. Another source, within a couple days, refuted what the first source said.
I understand someone thinking that TCU went too strong on revoking credentials but when a reporter publishes the offender's version of an assault that seems very irresponsible and potentially dangerous.
Again - would love to hear if I am missing something.
Would you be so kind as to respond to my post above? I'd like to understand the "unwelcome reporting" comment you quote.![]()
Barry Shlachter
s͏t͏S͏e͏o͏n͏p͏o͏d͏r͏8͏f͏h͏t͏t͏i͏1͏i͏5͏4͏h͏m͏0͏i͏1͏6͏0͏c͏9͏7͏t͏a͏h͏5͏4͏3͏6͏f͏f͏h͏7͏1͏8͏t͏t͏u͏1͏l͏2͏7͏1͏t͏u͏1͏5͏4͏1͏m͏l͏m͏ ·
TCU TO AMON CARTER’S NEWSPAPER: THANKS FOR THE STADIUM. NOW GET OUT
WELCOME BACK TO “YOU CAN’T MAKE THIS STUFF UP,” TCU HORNED FROG EDITION
+Cowtown Life with a Slice of Wry+
FORT WORTH — TCU athletic director Mike Buddie has apparently enrolled in the Donald Trump School of Media Relations: If you don’t like the journalism, ban the journalists.
TCU pulled the Fort Worth Star-Telegram’s athletic credentials after beat writer Steve Johnson reported on an Aug. 13 locker-room altercation that led to safety Jacob Fields being dismissed from the football team.
Buddie says the paper relied on inaccurate information and helped create a narrative that led to threats against another player and his family. The Star-Telegram says it didn’t identify that player until, get this, after he identified himself publicly on Instagram.
Fair enough. TCU has every right to dispute the reporting, demand corrections and produce evidence showing what the newspaper got wrong.
But here comes the part worthy of a sitcom.
According to the Star-Telegram, its reporter asked TCU and coach Sonny Dykes for comment before publishing. Dykes declined. University officials disputed the account but, the paper says, declined to provide their version for publication.
Buddie put on his best Kim Jong Un battle face and discovered that a press credential can double as a behavioral leash.
The problem is that journalists aren’t employees of TCU. Their job isn’t to make the athletic director happy. It’s to report, ask questions and correct errors when warranted.
Steven Johnson proved his grit, his professionalism and determination in the face of the Athletic Department's concerted stonewalling and brazen intimidation. But he got his biggest scoop since joining the paper. And it holds up.
LINK TO STORY:
https://www.star-telegram.com/.../article316971608.html
As for Buddie, he has performed that marvelous public-relations maneuver known as putting out a kitchen fire with gasoline.
By allowing Buddie to punish a newspaper for unwelcome reporting, TCU is teaching its students an egregious lesson just as the university works overtime to achieve national stature:
When scrutiny gets uncomfortable, suppress the scrutinizer.
Add that to County Judge Tim O’Hare’s ejections of outspoken citizens and DA Phil Sorrells’ prosecutions arising from Commissioners Court protests, and Fort Worth risks acquiring a national reputation it surely doesn’t want — as a place where free speech is treasured right up until somebody actually uses it.
DISCLAIMER: I toiled 29 years at the Star-Telegram. In addition, I've written several articles for TCU Magazine and spoken to a number of Frog journalism classes over the years. Moreover, my wee boutique press published Jim Reeve's "Remember the Alamo Bowl," about TCU walk-on QB Bram Kohlhausen's epic upset of Oregon, and "Purple Passion: TCU Football Legends" by Jeff Wilson.
SHARE IF YOU THINK “NO COMMENT" DOESN’T MEAN “NO REPORTING.”
#TCU #MikeBuddie #FortWorthStarTelegram #StarTelegram #FortWorth #TexasNews #Journalism #PressFreedom #FreePress #CollegeFootball #TCUFootball #MediaFreedom
That's the second dumbest thing I read today. The other was also a Facebook cut and paste hit piece.![]()
Barry Shlachter
s͏t͏S͏e͏o͏n͏p͏o͏d͏r͏8͏f͏h͏t͏t͏i͏1͏i͏5͏4͏h͏m͏0͏i͏1͏6͏0͏c͏9͏7͏t͏a͏h͏5͏4͏3͏6͏f͏f͏h͏7͏1͏8͏t͏t͏u͏1͏l͏2͏7͏1͏t͏u͏1͏5͏4͏1͏m͏l͏m͏ ·
TCU TO AMON CARTER’S NEWSPAPER: THANKS FOR THE STADIUM. NOW GET OUT
WELCOME BACK TO “YOU CAN’T MAKE THIS STUFF UP,” TCU HORNED FROG EDITION
+Cowtown Life with a Slice of Wry+
FORT WORTH — TCU athletic director Mike Buddie has apparently enrolled in the Donald Trump School of Media Relations: If you don’t like the journalism, ban the journalists.
TCU pulled the Fort Worth Star-Telegram’s athletic credentials after beat writer Steve Johnson reported on an Aug. 13 locker-room altercation that led to safety Jacob Fields being dismissed from the football team.
Buddie says the paper relied on inaccurate information and helped create a narrative that led to threats against another player and his family. The Star-Telegram says it didn’t identify that player until, get this, after he identified himself publicly on Instagram.
Fair enough. TCU has every right to dispute the reporting, demand corrections and produce evidence showing what the newspaper got wrong.
But here comes the part worthy of a sitcom.
According to the Star-Telegram, its reporter asked TCU and coach Sonny Dykes for comment before publishing. Dykes declined. University officials disputed the account but, the paper says, declined to provide their version for publication.
Buddie put on his best Kim Jong Un battle face and discovered that a press credential can double as a behavioral leash.
The problem is that journalists aren’t employees of TCU. Their job isn’t to make the athletic director happy. It’s to report, ask questions and correct errors when warranted.
Steven Johnson proved his grit, his professionalism and determination in the face of the Athletic Department's concerted stonewalling and brazen intimidation. But he got his biggest scoop since joining the paper. And it holds up.
LINK TO STORY:
https://www.star-telegram.com/.../article316971608.html
As for Buddie, he has performed that marvelous public-relations maneuver known as putting out a kitchen fire with gasoline.
A Fort Worth sports story is becoming a much bigger story about a national recognition-seeking university punishing its hometown newspaper for committing journalism in plain sight. Clearly, neither Buddie nor his TCU media handlers are ready for prime time. And it doesn't make the university as a whole look that good either. There’s a Fort Worth-sized irony here:
The football stadium from which TCU has now banished the Star-Telegram bears the name of the newspaper’s legendary publisher, Amon G. Carter.
In 1929, Carter headed the fundraising campaign for the new stadium, made an initial gift and helped sell the bonds that raised the roughly $350,000 needed to build it. The stadium opened in 1930 and was renamed for Carter in 1951. Decades later, the Amon G. Carter Foundation provided a $15 million lead gift toward its massive renovation.
No one should be surprised if Amon Carter — newspaper publisher, TCU benefactor and champion of both institutions — is doing somersaults in his Greenwood mausoleum while desperately trying to remain calm.
TCU banning Carter’s old newspaper from Amon G. Carter Stadium is rather like the Vatican banning Catholics from St. Peter’s for excessive praying.
By allowing Buddie to punish a newspaper for unwelcome reporting, TCU is teaching its students an egregious lesson just as the university works overtime to achieve national stature:
When scrutiny gets uncomfortable, suppress the scrutinizer.
Add that to County Judge Tim O’Hare’s ejections of outspoken citizens and DA Phil Sorrells’ prosecutions arising from Commissioners Court protests, and Fort Worth risks acquiring a national reputation it surely doesn’t want — as a place where free speech is treasured right up until somebody actually uses it.
DISCLAIMER: I toiled 29 years at the Star-Telegram. In addition, I've written several articles for TCU Magazine and spoken to a number of Frog journalism classes over the years. Moreover, my wee boutique press published Jim Reeve's "Remember the Alamo Bowl," about TCU walk-on QB Bram Kohlhausen's epic upset of Oregon, and "Purple Passion: TCU Football Legends" by Jeff Wilson.
SHARE IF YOU THINK “NO COMMENT" DOESN’T MEAN “NO REPORTING.”
#TCU #MikeBuddie #FortWorthStarTelegram #StarTelegram #FortWorth #TexasNews #Journalism #PressFreedom #FreePress #CollegeFootball #TCUFootball #MediaFreedom
It's just so bizarre to me. Players, coaches, and other team personnel are frequently disciplined and you NEVER see stories like this from major media.Well stated. A little more background. Another TCU sports forum had Dozie identified within hours of the SJ article. With all of his resources, SJ couldn't do the same thing and instead chose to go with the unsubstantiated bullship that he did. Lazy and pathetic reporting.
I don't think you missed anything. What I see is a 3rd rate newpaper with one foot in the grave that has a history of shoddy "journalism" quoting an anonymous source who was promoting an unverified account of a players' altercation that put the victim in danger of harrassment or worse. Instead of admitting that they were guilty of unprofessional journalism the Startlegram and its crappy reporters like Bud and Barry prefer to blame others for their serious mistakes.I'm genuinely interested in some additional perspective from those who think that TCU screwed up here, and I'm wondering if I'm missing any material facts. As I understand it:
Fields assaulted player B in the locker room and sent him to the hospital.
TCU kicked Fields off of the team for his actions.
An unidentified person connected to Fields contacted the Star Telegram, stating that Fields was bullied and somehow else mistreated, which potentially pointed some blame at player B. The paper ran with the story, likely approaching the school for information (TCU declined comment).
Player B separately identified himself as Ezukanma, and then received some harassment and threats.
The paper tried to reduce its blame by saying they hadn't identified player B (Personally I think this is silly because it wouldn't be difficult for people to figure out who was at practice on the day of the assault and then missing the next day).
Are any of those statements incorrect? Is there more background I'm missing?
To me, the paper made a grievous mistake by publishing ANY of the information provided by the source. SJ wrote it and at least one editor approved it. It seems crazy to publish the assailant's side at all and even worse from a second hand source. Another source, within a couple days, refuted what the first source said.
I understand someone thinking that TCU went too strong on revoking credentials but when a reporter publishes the offender's version of an assault that seems very irresponsible and potentially dangerous.
Again - would love to hear if I am missing something.

