ticketfrog123
Active Member
$25k / $57k isn’t 43% ??Is it tiring to be so wrong, so much, and to keep grasping at straws to justify all the assumptions and arguments you’ve made that aren’t backed up by objective facts?
If you say so, captain
$25k / $57k isn’t 43% ??Is it tiring to be so wrong, so much, and to keep grasping at straws to justify all the assumptions and arguments you’ve made that aren’t backed up by objective facts?
Actually, they don't. Unless you are speaking of grad school including medical and law. Rice and MIT, for example have about the lowest debt ratio of any university, state or private. This isn't hard information to find.This is extremely untrue. Every single example. Plenty of people graduate from those places with $100k+ in debt or more.
Every student gets a different aid package offer from every school. What may not be worth it to one student at one school may be for another. There is no one size fits all assessment as to average cost of attendance or average debt. The university, degree, student/family resources, location, services, value, etc. all play a unique role in the individual big picture. You can’t make a blanket assessment on one school’s value to individuals based on the “average” debt. That just fails to capture the reality of each unique situation.
Why this 5 year old clickbait slideshow (with dated and likely inaccurate data) has resurfaced and continues to be discussed on a very very low and intellectually/objectively dishonest or uninformed level is befuddling.
Where are you getting your information? Really. Mercedes for $33? A new Honda Civic is between 25 and 30. When are you going to answer how you paid your debt? Did your parents pay it for you? It's OK if they did, but at least try to walk in someone else's shoes.No college students “needs” a $33k car to reliably get to work. That is Mercedes / Acura / Lexus starting price.
Go buy a used Corolla or civic. Boom I saved you $23k. Now you only have $27k left to payoff
This blanket argument isn’t true. TCU is a much more competitive / selective school than it was in the 1980s. The blanket assessment ignores financial aid opportunities for low/middle income families. Is TCU more accessible to the wealthy? Absolutely. Is it *only* accessible to them? No. The value of the degree is up. We have work to do to get more scholarships for deserving students, but opportunities DO exist.This was in the late 80s. Lower middle to upper middle class could go to TCU at that time without having exorbitant debt on their backs. That just isn't true today and it keeps quality students from becoming horned frogs.
Lol. You’ve been wrong so many times you’re now left trying to tell me something I already told you 10 rounds ago. How sad for you.$25k / $57k isn’t 43% ??
If you say so, captain
Again, your blanket arguments continue to be wrong. You said no one graduates from Ivy’s or (weirdly) St. Ed’s) with $50k debt. That was obviously wrong - even if constrained to undergrads. Now you’re trying to argue debt ratios. Completely different things.Actually, they don't. Unless you are speaking of grad school including medical and law. Rice and MIT, for example have about the lowest debt ratio of any university, state or private. This isn't hard information to find.
I paid off my own debt. Was around $60k. My rent was $700/month for 5 years. My car payment was $200/month on a used Corolla. My car gasoline was $40/month.Where are you getting your information? Really. Mercedes for $33? A new Honda Civic is between 25 and 30. When are you going to answer how you paid your debt? Did your parents pay it for you? It's OK if they did, but at least try to walk in someone else's shoes.
There are differences, for sure. I probably wouldn't make it into TCU today based on my high school record. BUT I can read and I can see. TCU is much more affluent now regarding its student body. As for the value of the degree, it's always been good. I've done quite well for myself and the TCU transcript definitely helped. Where the opportunities do exist, it's not as much as in the past. It's not that it isn't possible. It's that it's not a real goal of the university at this time.This blanket argument isn’t true. TCU is a much more competitive / selective school than it was in the 1980s. The blanket assessment ignores financial aid opportunities for low/middle income families. Is TCU more accessible to the wealthy? Absolutely. Is it *only* accessible to them? No. The value of the degree is up. We have work to do to get more scholarships for deserving students, but opportunities DO exist.
I agree with you here - the debt ratios published by those schools are for need-only studentsAgain, your blanket arguments continue to be wrong. You said no one graduates from Ivy’s or (weirdly) St. Ed’s) with $50k debt. That was obviously wrong - even if constrained to undergrads. Now you’re trying to argue debt ratios. Completely different things.
It’s fascinating to watch you and ticketfrog miss out on making some decent points on the cost of higher education because you’re so confident in your right-ness that you mix up your own arguments and compare apples to waffles and whiff on your arguments.
Here’s your Mercedes for $33kWhere are you getting your information? Really. Mercedes for $33? A new Honda Civic is between 25 and 30. When are you going to answer how you paid your debt? Did your parents pay it for you? It's OK if they did, but at least try to walk in someone else's shoes.
I paid off my own debt. Was around $60k. My rent was $700/month for 5 years. My car payment was $200/month on a used Corolla. My car gasoline was $40/month.
Again - you’re claiming a new grad “needs” a new car. False.
Poor people overpaying on vehicles is the #1 trap that keeps them poo
No. It isn't that simple. Those are the average debt rates for students leaving with debt.I agree with you here - the debt ratios published by those schools are for need-only students
Plenty of middle class kids pay up, but they obviously have public statements about “if your family makes less than $100k it’s free blah blah”
The sample size of middle class kids at those schools you quoted is very small - so a majority of rich kids graduate without “debt” bc they’re mega wealthyNo. It isn't that simple. Those are the average debt rates for students leaving with debt.
And that brings us back to the original issue. TCU attracts many qualified students who can get admitted but can't go because the cost is prohibitive. One example. I was a HS principal with a student from an extremely impoverished background. Single parent home. Lots of rice and beans. He worked as a student to help with household finances. Aced ACT math. Missed 2 on SAT math. Passed a few AP tests with 5s including calculus. Definitely got into TCU and received what TCU called generous. He was estimated to leave with "only" $30,000 debt. He was also accepted to MIT, full ride. This full ride also included flights to and from home and spending money so that he could function as a typical MIT student. MIT's philosophy of education led them to see this student as the "exact" type of student they wanted to reach. The student is helped and so is society at large. It breaks a cycle of poverty through hard work. He left with no debt and is now a software programmer for Google. He has a younger sister and brother who saw his example. The sister is now a sophomore at Princeton and his brother is a HS senior being courted by Columbia. TCU would be enhanced with this caliber of student that would offer diversity to the campus and make it more of a well-rounded experience.The sample size of middle class kids at those schools you quoted is very small - so a majority of rich kids graduate without “debt” bc they’re mega wealthy
It’s high net worth families where $250k is nothing and Pell grant recipients - not much in between
Maybe I’m working backwards but no way should that kid ever have given serious consideration to TCU with acceptances from the other schoolsAnd that brings us back to the original issue. TCU attracts many qualified students who can get admitted but can't go because the cost is prohibitive. One example. I was a HS principal with a student from an extremely impoverished background. Single parent home. Lots of rice and beans. He worked as a student to help with household finances. Aced ACT math. Missed 2 on SAT math. Passed a few AP tests with 5s including calculus. Definitely got into TCU and received what TCU called generous. He was estimated to leave with "only" $30,000 debt. He was also accepted to MIT, full ride. This full ride also included flights to and from home and spending money so that he could function as a typical MIT student. MIT's philosophy of education led them to see this student as the "exact" type of student they wanted to reach. The student is helped and so is society at large. It breaks a cycle of poverty through hard work. He left with no debt and is now a software programmer for Google. He has a younger sister and brother who saw his example. The sister is now a sophomore at Princeton and his brother is a HS senior being courted by Columbia. TCU would be enhanced with this caliber of student that would offer diversity to the campus and make it more of a well-rounded experience.
Don't divert from the point. I love TCU. The student liked and respected me a lot. So he applied. You know, you apply to shoe-in schools. Not uncommon, bud.Maybe I’m working backwards but no way should that kid ever have given serious consideration to TCU with acceptances from the other schools
Once the admissions is a yes from Ivy League - TCU is crossed off - those are different academic environment and caliber of institutions
"Weirdly, St. Eds." Why is that "weirdly" oh wise one who is the only person with a brain on this thread according to you?Again, your blanket arguments continue to be wrong. You said no one graduates from Ivy’s or (weirdly) St. Ed’s) with $50k debt. That was obviously wrong - even if constrained to undergrads. Now you’re trying to argue debt ratios. Completely different things.
It’s fascinating to watch you and ticketfrog miss out on making some decent points on the cost of higher education because you’re so confident in your right-ness that you mix up your own arguments and compare apples to waffles and whiff on your arguments.
Stafford student loans are backed by what?Getting the feds out is what caused the increase. How do you not know that?
Those are not the only loans. There used to be better regulation on student loans until the early 2000s when private loans increased exponentially. Deregulation allowed it to get out of hand. The Obama administration claimed to try and correct it but actually made it worse. Trump only worsened what was started by Obama. So, yes, government bears much of the current responsibility. But if we look at the 1950s to 2000, the government loan process allowed access to higher education for more people without outrageous debt.Stafford student loans are backed by what?
It this fellow choose TCU over MIT/Ivy/Stanford etc. it would be proof that he'd been dropped on his head as a child (or similar.)Maybe I’m working backwards but no way should that kid ever have given serious consideration to TCU with acceptances from the other schools
Once the admissions is a yes from Ivy League - TCU is crossed off - those are different academic environment and caliber of institutions