Armadillo
Full Member
Lock thread. Easily the post of the year!
His opinion that you increase your chances of being a MLBer by going to college.
so you are saying that of the top high schools prospects - the ones that go to college have a lower rate of success in pro ball then the ones that don't go to college?This isn't something I completely agree with but instead of arguing against it I'll just say this...... you go to school to get a degree, or to have the college experience....... you DO NOT go to school to get a bigger bonus or increase your odds of playing in MLB. It's a bad plan that fails more than it succeeds.
so you are saying that of the top high schools prospects - the ones that go to college have a lower rate of success in pro ball then the ones that don't go to college?
or are you talking about overall the total number of kids that play college ball and get drafted vs the number of kids that go straight to the pros?
Take it back. Now.Perhaps Deep can point us in the right direction for the details.
Take it back. Now.
That was something else Schloss said. Musers asked what the Big 12 had changed for him and if they were making more money now. He mentioned how only 1 or 2 schools actually earn a profit on baseball. The rest lose money and now TCU was just losing less money. And said that was with TCU being #1 in attendance for private schools.
Then he mentioned that joining the Big 12 took away the recruiting disadvantage in the past of conference affiliation.
Holy crap this is the perfect response.
Well, I'm deflated. Thought for once I'd gotten out of the penalty box.Take it back. Now.
This isn't something I completely agree with but instead of arguing against it I'll just say this...... you go to school to get a degree, or to have the college experience....... you DO NOT go to school to get a bigger bonus or increase your odds of playing in MLB. It's a bad plan that fails more than it succeeds.
Agreed. I don't think it helps the player get into the majors. That said players drafted from college are twice as likely to make the majors. Probably due to less knowns with a couple more years of development.?
Even if it doesn't improve the individuals chances it gives them a backup plan. That said doubt I would turn down million plus.
noticed this stat View attachment 3197 during the game vs. TT and found it interesting
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/syndication.bleacherreport.com/amp/1219356I don't have the data (would love to see it), but I think that "twice as likely" stat gets misrepresented. MLB drafts and signs WAY more college kids than they do HS kids, and it isn't because they're better or more prepared, it's because they're cheaper. Go look at a list of any club's draft signings from this year in a couple months and the typical breakdown is gonna be close to 80-90 percent of them being college kids. The end result is that there are more MLB players who signed out of college than there are players who signed out of HS. I suspect the percentages of players that get to MLB within these two groups are actually fairly similar. I'm sure that data exists somewhere.
Those are the stats Schloss cited when making his argument.
So 75% of the kids drafted are in college but that alone doesn't show you stand a better chance to go pro if you go to college?
I would bet its high and probably doesn't matter if they are hs or collegeAll the pissing matches aside, I'd love to see a stat of simply 1st rounders who ever play a full season in the majors. I'm guessing 75-80% ?