I'm more concerned we're going to be forcing it to Reagor too much than him not getting enough touches. We need to develop more weapons in the passing game, I think we have the some kids that could step up if given the chance, but it's going to hard for them if every downfield throw is going to Reagor. Last year it was embarrassing how one-dimensional our passing game had become.
Purdue v Nevada
- Thread starter Froglaw
- Start date
I'm more concerned we're going to be forcing it to Reagor too much than him not getting enough touches. We need to develop more weapons in the passing game, I think we have the some kids that could step up if given the chance, but it's going to hard for them if every downfield throw is going to Reagor. Last year it was embarrassing how one-dimensional our passing game had become.
ThisIsOurTime
Active Member
1. After last season, I will be happy to see a passing a game where we can distribute the ball all over the field.
2. I do expect some players like TE Wells to become worthy targets who will demand touches. Time will tell regarding other receiving threats.
3. Still, we need to get the ball to Reagor and even force it sometimes because he can make plays others cannot. Even better if that forces the defense to overcommit to him and free up some other receivers to make plays.
CountryFrog
Active Member
I don't care at all if we have 4 guys with 40+ catches or Reagor has 90 and no one else has more than 30. As long as we are moving the ball, not turning it over, and scoring points.
