• The KillerFrogs

Paging TCUOwnsthebig12

M

Moose Stuff

Active Member
Ron Swanson said:
I didn’t read the original thread, but it seems like that “lucky to make the NIT” comment was sarcasm that many people missed, which is a big part of the reason this whole thread happened.
Click to expand...

A contributing factor to both the existence of this thread and it’s length is the poster in question lacking the ability to state his case and move on, ignoring subsequent responses to him from people who at this point are just piling on for [ Finebaum ]s and giggles (myself included).
 
P

purplePPO

Guest
ifrog said:
Pot meet kettle. You hated the TCU QB this past season so you are just as much a hater mr parking lot patrol
Click to expand...

Wrong. I never hate. I disliked your obsessive, compulsive fixation on a slightly average QB. You still posting from your mothers basement? Asking for a friend.
 
WhiteHispanicFrog

WhiteHispanicFrog

Curmudgeon
15C9403A-155D-46C3-8968-4AA6C362095E.gif
 
I

ifrog

Active Member
Lol did you miss me PPO?

For the record the troll that you responded to is not a friend. Just pointing out the hypocrisy. Carry on
 
P

purplePPO

Guest
ifrog said:
Lol did you miss me PPO?

For the record the troll that you responded to is not a friend. Just pointing out the hypocrisy. Carry on
Click to expand...

I could have sworn it was you. It's like talking with and trying to reason with a brick wall. It reminded me of you. Carry on!
 
Frog-in-law1995

Frog-in-law1995

Active Member
Ron Swanson said:
I didn’t read the original thread, but it seems like that “lucky to make the NIT” comment was sarcasm that many people missed, which is a big part of the reason this whole thread happened.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I’ve been so confused. While we’re at it, perhaps I’m misunderstanding this, and I apologize if so, but if 75% of the time, an 11 seed is the lowest given to non-auto qualifiers, but 25% of the time it’s a 12, then presuming 11 will be the lowest this year seems pretty logical. Is there more to it I’m missing?
 
TCUownstheBig12

TCUownstheBig12

Active Member
Frog-in-law1995 said:
Yeah, I’ve been so confused. While we’re at it, perhaps I’m misunderstanding this, and I apologize if so, but if 75% of the time, an 11 seed is the lowest given to non-auto qualifiers, but 25% of the time it’s a 12, then presuming 11 will be the lowest this year seems pretty logical. Is there more to it I’m missing?
Click to expand...

Thank you.
 
S

SuperTFrog

Active Member
Frog-in-law1995 said:
Yeah, I’ve been so confused. While we’re at it, perhaps I’m misunderstanding this, and I apologize if so, but if 75% of the time, an 11 seed is the lowest given to non-auto qualifiers, but 25% of the time it’s a 12, then presuming 11 will be the lowest this year seems pretty logical. Is there more to it I’m missing?
Click to expand...
If he would have said “based on previous years it has either been an 11 or a 12 so I used an 11” then no one would have cared.
 
S

SuperTFrog

Active Member
TCUownstheBig12 said:
By this logic, you are wrong because it has been a 13 and 14 seed as well (once each in the 14 cases).
Click to expand...
I agree, you should have written a 13 or 14 seed. I think at this point you are arguing with yourself. Everybody knows that you are completely wrong except for you. The internet is a safe place for you.
 
TCUownstheBig12

TCUownstheBig12

Active Member
SuperTFrog said:
I agree, you should have written a 13 or 14 seed. I think at this point you are arguing with yourself. Everybody knows that you are completely wrong except for you. The internet is a safe place for you.
Click to expand...

Nope. You were wrong in theory and in practice. You are just flat out wrong, no matter how you slice and dice it.

Sorry, bud...better luck next time.
 

Latest posts

Top