Sorry, but this is a very one sided and incomplete recollection of what happened. Let me say very clearly I don't know who killed those two individuals or whether Ray Lewis is involved. I'm a Baltimore Ravens fan and have enjoyed having Ray Lewis play on my team, but I don't pretent to know who he truly is as a person or what he has been involved in.
However, what this story fails to report is that these "victims" were actually the instigators of the fights that night and most witnesses report that Ray Lewis was trying to be the peacemaker in the situation. The two men he was with were tried for murder and acquitted. I'm not naive enough to say that makes them innocent, but I don't understand how individuals can then jump to Ray Lewis is a murderer.
Finally, this is a woman who had 9 children and admits to giving them to her mother to raise while she was in and out of jail. Now she wants to financially benefit from her son's death because someone famous is associated it with it? Sorry, I'm not buying that. A settlement was made to care for the unborn child of her son, which is fortunate, considering no one was ever convicted of the crime. I don't begrudge that child the money at all, but do you think there would be any consideration of such a financial settlement at all if a famous athlete's name isn't associated with the case?
I have no idea if Ray Lewis is a good man or not. His foundation has done a lot of good work here in Baltimore, but I know how to separate the two. But articles like this are ridiculously one sided and fail to tell the complexities of this story.
Some other articles that give a more balanced view of the situation.
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/bs-md-rodricks-0115-20130114,0,1074931.column
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/ray-lewis-baltimore-ravens-retiring-earned-respect-aftermath-double-murder-trial-011113
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1473116-ray-lewis-critics-who-bring-up-controversial-past-need-to-get-facts-straight