• The KillerFrogs

Official Coaching Search Thread….

gofor2

Active Member
I don’t know how appropriate that visual is, but it is funny.

Sometimes people like to nitpick and argue the extraneous even when the intended meaning was pretty clear in the context of the discussion. That may have been what tipped off your back and forth, maybe needlessly.

There is a disconnect somewhere but I think I figured it out.
 

Prince of Purpoole II

Reigning Smartarse
What role was that? If it wasn't OC then TCU clearly didn't value him high enough to want him to be head coach 4 years later based on being mediocre in the American Conference.
Sonny: Hey Gary, SMU offered me the HC spot and north of $3 million per year!

Gary: We hate to lose you. I tell you what: You can have any job here but mine.

Sonny: Well, I really want to be top dog and hire my own staff. If I stay can I have $3 million per year?

Gary: Lol no

Sonny: Then I’m sure you’ll understand. I just have to leave for the promotion and the money. I get to stay in N Texas too!

Gary: Oh I understand. Hell everyone will. Except hiphopfroggy of course.
 

flyfishingfrog

Active Member
What role was that? If it wasn't OC then TCU clearly didn't value him high enough to want him to be head coach 4 years later based on being mediocre in the American Conference.
How do you know it wasn’t OC or a higher paid version of what Kill is doing or Asst HC or head Pooba- the point is it wasn’t our HC job and that is what Sonny wanted to be, so after Spyke passed away and the SMU offer came in - he moved on
 
Last edited:

Froggish

Active Member
While I understand your sentiment about cherry picking, does what he did 10 years ago matter right now when we are talking results and job performance? I don't think it does. If it did, GP would still be here.
I think it does...so a 10 year body of work is irrelevant but a 3 year body of work isn't relevant enough? All of that is subjective and arbitrary. Last time I checked he's on his most successful 3 year run in his coaching career. (Like how I framed that little micro cherry picking stat?). It like we are looking at a trend graph. Give me a break. That's pretty much the very definition of cherry picking don't you think? I'm not stumping for Dykes but the eye of the beholder stuff is tiresome. I get why someone might think he's not right for the job because people don't like his record, or his personality, or the fact that he's not ever been referenced in a hip hop lyric. I just think its funny the people feel like they have to frame him up in weird little micro lenses to make their point. Of course we should tread lightly.

Whoever the candidate is we really only need to know that he can either continue on with his current success or be an even better version of himself with TCU logo on. I honestly think there are 3-4 current candidates that we can say that about and Dykes is one of them. PEOPLE...There are NO SURE THINGS in CFB Coaching hires.

There is literally not a current coach in College Football that I couldn't make an excellent argument for or against to be the next coach at TCU. That includes Saban..Give me Culture Builder 1, Resume/Proof of Concept 2, Recruiting 3, and Motive 4........I think if prioritize those things than we will find a really good coach.
 
Last edited:

Prince of Purpoole II

Reigning Smartarse
I think it does...so a 10 year body of work is irrelevant but a 3 year body of work isn't relevant enough? All of that is subjective and arbitrary. Last time I checked he's on his most successful 3 year run in his coaching career. (Like how I framed that little micro cherry picking stat?). It like we are looking at a trend graph. Give me a break. That's pretty much the very definition of cherry picking don't you think? I'm not stumping for Dykes but the eye of the beholder stuff is tiresome. I get why someone might think he's not right for the job because people don't like his record, or his personality, or the fact that he's not ever been referenced in a hip hop lyric. I just think its funny the people feel like they have to frame him up in weird little micro lenses to make their point. Of course we should tread lightly.

Whoever the candidate is we really only need to know that he can either continue on with his current success or be an even better version of himself with TCU logo on. I honestly think there are 3-4 current candidates that we can say that about and Dykes is one of them. PEOPLE...There are NO SURE THINGS in CFB Coaching hires.

There is literally not a current coaching College Football that I couldn't make an excellent argument for or against to be the next coach at TCU. That includes Saban..Give me Culture Builder 1, Resume/Proof of Concept 2, Recruiting 3, and Motive 4........I think if prioritize those things than we will find a really good coach.
Well put
 

Putt4Purple

Active Member
Could a head coach come from the current assistant coaching staff? Just asking. It may surprise everyone when we hear coach, Meacham, Hill, Modkins? If you said no then maybe Patterson did not have the proper assistant coaches after all. How sad, only after the fact it comes to reality. Go Frogs!
 

flyfishingfrog

Active Member
Could a head coach come from the current assistant coaching staff? Just asking. It may surprise everyone when we hear coach, Meacham, Hill, Modkins? If you said no then maybe Patterson did not have the proper assistant coaches after all. How sad, only after the fact it comes to reality. Go Frogs!
Isn't the prevailing perception that his stubbornness about resisting change and his loyalty to a small circle of guys that he either taught to coach or coached as a player in his system was his downfall in the end - so why would we then promote one of the people that ultimately led to us firing our legendary HC because they sucked?
 
Last edited:

gofor2

Active Member
I don’t care about your scenario because it’s 100% irrelevant to the original observation I made (to SOMEONE ELSE’S post I might add). That you can’t understand my last paragraph speaks far more to your lack of intelligence than it does mine.


There is a disconnect here but I think I figured it out. I don't know what you are referring to (in bold) because I was not part of that conversation. I didn't read it. My scenario post wasn't a response to, or a reply to anything that you had posted. My reply to Palliative Care was an isolated reply, to a topic that I was discussing with other people.

And since then, we have been crossed up, wondering what the other person is talking about. I'm sorry for flinging anything that could be perceived or received as an insult. Are we good?
 
Last edited:

DomerFrog

New Member
I'd forgotten he was a Mount Union guy. I like him more now. Speaking of Mount Union Vince Kehres' name mentioned for a few jobs. He is the DC at Toledo. There is a lot to like about Mount Union coaches. I am always a little shocked in Texas nobody considers some of the D3 guys. They have to recruit locally, and they do quite well at the national level.
For what it's worth...I think Chancellor Boschini is a Mount Union alum. If Campbell is their #1 target maybe the two can bond over that...LOL!
 
I'd forgotten he was a Mount Union guy. I like him more now. Speaking of Mount Union Vince Kehres' name mentioned for a few jobs. He is the DC at Toledo. There is a lot to like about Mount Union coaches. I am always a little shocked in Texas nobody considers some of the D3 guys. They have to recruit locally, and they do quite well at the national level.
For those who don’t know, legendary head coach Larry Kehres (Vince’s father) won 11 Division III championships at Mount Union—Matt Campbell was a D lineman on three and the Offensive Coordinator/O Line coach on two others.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Kehres
“Kehres retired from coaching in May 2013 with a record of 332–24–3 as head coach of the Mount Union Purple Raiders football team, and a winning percentage of .929, the highest in college football history.”
“Kehres is 3–1 against college football's all-time winningest coach, John Gagliardi, having beaten Gagliardi's St. John's squads twice in playoff match-ups and traded wins in the national title game in 2000 and 2003.”

John Gagliardi was another Division III legendary coach (all time winningest college head coach) at Saint John’s University in Minnesota. He was known for practicing with little contact (no tackling), wanting his team free of injury, fresh and itching for contact on game day (or something like that).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Gagliardi
“Gagliardi was known for his unique coaching approach, which he called "Winning with No's." He instructed his players not to call him "coach", did not use a whistle or blocking sleds, prohibited tackling in practices, did not require his players to lift weights, and limited his team practices to 90 minutes.”
 
Last edited:

4th. down

Active Member
Since we are playing the what if game, what if we win out and it's not impossible but obviously not probable, or just make a bowl? Do we promote from within?
 

gofor2

Active Member
I think it does...so a 10 year body of work is irrelevant but a 3 year body of work isn't relevant enough?
you make some good points and I can go with several. Not so sure about this ^.

I'm not 100% sure what 10 year and 3 year bodies of work you are referring too? I didn't say a 10 year body of work is irrelevant. I did say what was done 10 years ago, isn't relevant.

For example, GP was 11-2 in 2011. We won the Poinsettia Bowl vs. La Tech, who was ironically, coached by Dykes. I would say that the decision to fire GP was based on his last 4 years, not his 2011 season.

I think Dykes has enough coaching data for us to get a feel for how he would do. We could expect a poor defense, good offense and overall a serviceable program. Probably 4-6th place with an occasional 2nd or 3rd place finish and an occasional bowl win. (he is 1-3 in bowls). That's written without deep diving into more statistical data.
 
Last edited:
Top