Moose Stuff
Active Member
Lazy recruiter for starters.Please elucidate...
Lazy recruiter for starters.Please elucidate...
I'd be fine with Mullen but it's humorous to me that the people who want to "inject energy and enthusiasm into the program" want to do that with someone who was just fired for grossly underperforming at a program with tons of resources and built in advantages.Is there some alternate universe going on today? How is a guy who can’t win or run his program well enough not to get fired at the University of Florida a good hire for TCU? I don’t get it.
Nice contribution. Would read again.This a great thread. A handful of people posting the same thing over and over and over. Cool.
Announcement this week?
That was my point. If he can’t do it at a place with all those advantages how would he succeed here and how is he better hire than someone who has done pretty well at a place like SMU that has almost no advantages? He’s a bigger name I guess but that doesn’t matter once the games kick off.I'd be fine with Mullen but it's humorous to me that the people who want to "inject energy and enthusiasm into the program" want to do that with someone who was just fired for grossly underperforming at a program with tons of resources and built in advantages.
You’re obviously a troll
I hear you on that. I'd point to his success at Mississippi St as reason why I think he could succeed at TCU. The Florida stuff ain't great.That was my point. If he can’t do it at a place with all those advantages how would he succeed here and how is he better hire than someone who has done pretty well at a place like SMU that has almost no advantages? He’s a bigger name I guess but that doesn’t matter once the games kick off.
Other than double digit win recent success (which I get is a big negative for a lot of people) he really is a good fit. Texas ties, relationships with HS coaches, offensive pedigree (coached under Mumme, Leach and has had coached multiple top 10 QBs), coaching experience at all levels, experience and success with the portal, all are factors that could increase chances of success. Needs to make good asst coaching hires, but that’s true of all potential hires.I hear you on that. I'd point to his success at Mississippi St as reason why I think he could succeed at TCU. The Florida stuff ain't great.
But again I'm fine with Dykes mainly because I think he's a better fit culturally at TCU than someone like Mullen.
Does next Sunday count as this week?Announcement this week?
Dan Mullen possesses almost none of the intangible ingredients needed to succeed at a place like TCU in my opinion.
Knute Rockne is coming back?
It was a pre-determined set of search criteria so that the BMDs could get their comfortable buddy hire back in the hunting lodge.
Yes, its a shallow candidate pool. But given the MASSIVE changes hitting NCAA football in next 2-4 years and impacts to the university, relaxing some filters (existing head coaching) and swinging for a riskier but home run potential hire while laying out ALL the resources to be successful was the right path. instead we hooked up with an old, comfortable girlfriend.
Exactly what I said and have felt since Halloween. Great job getting rid of the legend that put everything he had into this program with no real vision as to what may be available. Hopefully, just hopefully, they have an silent agreement with someone, my preference is Napier, so this doesn’t turn into an even bigger disaster.
I’ll hang up and listen to the experts who never participated in college athletics and/or never coached a sport at the high school or college level.