New helmets for bowl game
- Thread starter crash813
- Start date
TronCarter
New Member
Pretty much have to get Buffalo Wild Wings now
Ron Swanson
Full Member
Ha, stealing this
$mooth
Active Member
They've gone weak. The last few times I was there, the wings were piddly things. Still good sauces and dry rubs, but not enough meat. That along with their anti-gun mentality drove me away.
West Coast Johnny
Full Member
The sponsor would love this.
An-Cap Frog
Member
What kind of sauce?
frogforward
Active Member
Boo hoo.
Yes, a private business choosing not to allow guns, or otherwise not caving under pressure from the gun lobby, is "weak."
But being afraid to be without a gun for one hour while eating or watching some sports is certainly not weak.
Should the state force them to allow guns in their establishments? Surely you support the freedom of business owners to chose -- just as you are still welcome to chose another restaurant/bar where you can carry your lil' ol' pistol, Yosemite.
P.S. Some perspective, please. Choosing not to allow guns, concealed or not, is hardly "anti-gun" -- more like, "gun neutral" and I support them for it, just as I welcome smoking-free establishments. Save your ammo (verbal only, please) for James Brady or something more "anti-gun" than a sign that says "don't bring your gun in here." Geez, the hyperbole of these "victims of gun-non-violence," I swear... I imagine people (obviously not $mooth, of course) who go through life feverishly looking for gun-related insult in every corner, afraid of 50% of the people they see on the street, stocking up on ammo every time Obama gets elected and who have to retreat to their man-cave to mumble to themselves and fondle their oiled weapons. Ugh, now I'm just grossing myself out.
I should take my own advice and stick to the topic. [Vent mode off]
$mooth
Active Member
Boo hoo.
Yes, a private business choosing not to allow guns, or otherwise not caving under pressure from the gun lobby, is "weak."
But being afraid to be without a gun for one hour while eating or watching some sports is certainly not weak.
Should the state force them to allow guns in their establishments? Surely you support the freedom of business owners to chose -- just as you are still welcome to chose another restaurant/bar where you can carry your lil' ol' pistol, Yosemite.
P.S. Some perspective, please. Choosing not to allow guns, concealed or not, is hardly "anti-gun" -- more like, "gun neutral" and I support them for it, just as I welcome smoking-free establishments. Save your ammo (verbal only, please) for James Brady or something more "anti-gun" than a sign that says "don't bring your gun in here." Geez, the hyperbole of these "victims of gun-non-violence," I swear... I imagine people (obviously not $mooth, of course) who go through life feverishly looking for gun-related insult in every corner, afraid of 50% of the people they see on the street, stocking up on ammo every time Obama gets elected and who have to retreat to their man-cave to mumble to themselves and fondle their oiled weapons. Ugh, now I'm just grossing myself out.
HAHA. You're a little confused there and making a lot of assumptions. Their anti-gun stance does not make them week. I choose not to patronize places that are anti-gun. It's cute how you think that nothing bad can happen while you're eating lunch. Just like nothing bad can happen in a movie theater or classroom, right?
Why would I want to gov't to force them to do anything? They're a private business, they can choose who they allow through the door and I can choose not to give them any of my money (which is pretty much what I said in my post). Feel free to go to the general board if you want to discuss further.
ftwfrog
Active Member
Me too. So awesome!!
Know nothing about gun laws, and I'm glad we turned a horned frog with a chicken wing in his mouth into a political debate, but aren't guns outlawed in all bars?
DeuceBoogieNights
Active Member
This is hilarious. Well played
Deep Purple
Full Member
Boo hoo.
Yes, a private business choosing not to allow guns, or otherwise not caving under pressure from the gun lobby, is "weak."
But being afraid to be without a gun for one hour while eating or watching some sports is certainly not weak.
Should the state force them to allow guns in their establishments? Surely you support the freedom of business owners to chose -- just as you are still welcome to chose another restaurant/bar where you can carry your lil' ol' pistol, Yosemite.
P.S. Some perspective, please. Choosing not to allow guns, concealed or not, is hardly "anti-gun" -- more like, "gun neutral" and I support them for it, just as I welcome smoking-free establishments. Save your ammo (verbal only, please) for James Brady or something more "anti-gun" than a sign that says "don't bring your gun in here." Geez, the hyperbole of these "victims of gun-non-violence," I swear... I imagine people (obviously not $mooth, of course) who go through life feverishly looking for gun-related insult in every corner, afraid of 50% of the people they see on the street, stocking up on ammo every time Obama gets elected and who have to retreat to their man-cave to mumble to themselves and fondle their oiled weapons. Ugh, now I'm just grossing myself out.
Ron Swanson
Full Member
You must not have gone during chicken season
