• The KillerFrogs

Need a good laugh at Texas’ expense?

Wexahu

Full Member

Sonny Dykes has coached at Louisiana Tech, Cal, SMU for about 80% of his career and has a 57% career winning %.

Sark has coached at Washington, USC and Texas and has a 62% winning %.

One coach has been underappreciated, one has massively underachieved (and somehow is considered the better coach).

Perceptions are weird, and hard to shake. Whether positive or negative.
 

TxFrog1999

The Man Behind The Curtain
Sonny Dykes has coached at Louisiana Tech, Cal, SMU for about 80% of his career and has a 57% career winning %.

Sark has coached at Washington, USC and Texas and has a 62% winning %.

One coach has been underappreciated, one has massively underachieved (and somehow is considered the better coach).

Perceptions are weird, and hard to shake. Whether positive or negative.
Are you really comparing stepping into a coaching role at LaTech, Cal, and SMU to Washington, USC, and Texas? One path has to rebuild every season, the other reloads. Come on.
 

Wexahu

Full Member
Are you really comparing stepping into a coaching role at LaTech, Cal, and SMU to Washington, USC, and Texas? One path has to rebuild every season, the other reloads. Come on.
Maybe you misunderstood.

I'm saying a 57% winning % at La Tech, Cal, SMU and TCU is more impressive than a 62% winning % at Washington, USC and Texas. And I'd probably argue far more impressive, because if you're not winning at least 2/3 of your games at UT, something is wrong. Yet if you see any "best coaches" list, Sarkisian is almost always listed higher than Dykes.

As I said, perceptions or reputations or whatever you want to call them are strange. And hard to shake.
 

An-Cap Frog

Member
Are you really comparing stepping into a coaching role at LaTech, Cal, and SMU to Washington, USC, and Texas? One path has to rebuild every season, the other reloads. Come on.
Even a larger indictment...should be better than just beating UTEP, San Jose State, and Sam Houston State.
 

TxFrog1999

The Man Behind The Curtain
Maybe you misunderstood.

I'm saying a 57% winning % at La Tech, Cal, SMU and TCU is more impressive than a 62% winning % at Washington, USC and Texas. And I'd probably argue far more impressive, because if you're not winning at least 2/3 of your games at UT, something is wrong. Yet if you see any "best coaches" list, Sarkisian is almost always listed higher than Dykes.

As I said, perceptions or reputations or whatever you want to call them are strange. And hard to shake.
Yes, I misunderstood the point you were making, my apologies. Thank you for the clarification.
 

Limp Lizard

Full Member
Even I could recruit at Texas. Just walk in the 4*/5*'s house wearing a burnt orange shirt hand the prospect your burnt orange pen the kid will sign. All jobs should be so easy!
Then after three or four years on a mediocre team, leave to be an all-pro in the NFL!
 
Top