Sounds like a bunch of entitled crybabies whose candidate didn’t win a beauty contest.
If it's too much of a beating, [ get out of here ].
Not original but the 3 doesn't look like an S.I mean….replacing letters of HEISMAN with numbers isn’t exactly original.
You left out “Caleb paints ‘ Utah’ on his fingernails”Sounds like a bunch of entitled crybabies whose candidate didn’t win a beauty contest.
“Max was the only one who looked the former winners in the eye!”
“Max was the best dressed!”
“Max has the best handshake!”
“Caleb’s clothes are too big!”
“Oh my goodness the tags are on his suit!”
Get a grip.
Sounds like a bunch of entitled crybabies whose candidate didn’t win a beauty contest.
“Max was the only one who looked the former winners in the eye!”
“Max was the best dressed!”
“Max has the best handshake!”
“Caleb’s clothes are too big!”
“Oh my goodness the tags are on his suit!”
Get a grip.
I’m not complaining about people complaining. I’m bitching about people acting like [hundinnen ].Says the guy complaining about what people post
Get a grip, lol
There’s nothing more Karen than complaining about other people complaining
To be clear, I’m not complaining about you complaining about people complaining
I just find it funny
Never change
I’m not complaining about people complaining. I’m bitching about people acting like [hundinnen ].
Huge difference!
Sounds like a bunch of entitled crybabies whose candidate didn’t win a beauty contest.
“Max was the only one who looked the former winners in the eye!”
“Max was the best dressed!”
“Max has the best handshake!”
“Caleb’s clothes are too big!”
“Oh my goodness the tags are on his suit!”
Get a grip.
You have to really question how many of the 870 media who participate in voting actually watched many of the games.
My HR department can send me training videos and can track whether or not we watch the videos. Surely an organization with the resources of the Heisman Trust can create a similar system that requires voters to watch a minimum number of recorded games of the top candidates and then track whether or not they watched them in order to verify their vote.
I'm not saying this would have changed the overall outcome, but in this day and age, with all the technology available, there really is no excuse to not have highly educated voters.
Well, there are quite a few people here who seem to know who should have won. I wonder how many non-TCU games were watched to come to that conclusion.You have to really question how many of the 870 media who participate in voting actually watched many of the games.
My HR department can send me training videos and can track whether or not we watch the videos. Surely an organization with the resources of the Heisman Trust can create a similar system that requires voters to watch a minimum number of recorded games of the top candidates and then track whether or not they watched them in order to verify their vote.
I'm not saying this would have changed the overall outcome, but in this day and age, with all the technology available, there really is no excuse to not have highly educated voters.
I think you’re off the mark here. Many sports writers don’t have time to watch on Saturdays because they are covering a single game most of the day.Well, there are quite a few people here who seem to know who should have won. I wonder how many non-TCU games were watched to come to that conclusion.
I would guess the people who vote probably take a little time to do their research, more than the average fan since they have somewhat of an obligation, but I’m sure they just make assumptions and are swayed by public opinion quite a bit.
I was shocked it was Caleb Williams, I thought Max was the most-likely winner given the momentum he was playing with recently.
you realize a lot of the people who have a Heisman vote are some the same idiots that have an AP vote each week also....Well, there are quite a few people here who seem to know who should have won. I wonder how many non-TCU games were watched to come to that conclusion.
I would guess the people who vote probably take a little time to do their research, more than the average fan since they have somewhat of an obligation, but I’m sure they just make assumptions and are swayed by public opinion quite a bit.
Right. I don't really consider them all idiots, but oh well.you realize a lot of the people who have a Heisman vote are some the same idiots that have an AP vote each week also....
Well I would hope if you are given a vote and decided to cast it- that each person would make a concerted effort to watch the top candidates since you can find all these games on the internet after the fact - but I doubt it which is why it perfectly acceptable to question their votesRight. I don't really consider them all idiots, but oh well.
There are roughly 55 D1 games each weekend. How in the hell can you expect anyone to watch 20% of them, much less all of them? I assume they have lives too. And I doubt anyone here saw every game that Caleb Williams, CJ Stroud, or Stenson Bennett, or any of the Top 10 candidates played this year.....like I assume you did MD's. So all the voters are to some degree uninformed and making their picks based on something other than what is seen on the field.