Louisville - 89th schedule rank, 2 losses and no top 30 wins

[Smooth42]

I know they receive and automatic but had to point out. NIU and Louisville making the so called top 10 teams in BCS is a joke. What a mess.

 

[Caprock]

And roddog shows up in 3,2,1.... :tongue:

 

[Shadow Dweller]

It could be worse. It could be a, what was it, 6-6 U-Conn from a few years ago against OU? Or even this year's Wiscy (5 loss) in the Rose? Granted, their only "bad" loss was to Michigan State, but still, a 5 loss team in the Rose?

 

[Aloha Frog]

And roddog shows up in 3,2,1.... :tongue:

TCU has always had a handful of really good teams on the schedule. It wasn't Big 12 but it was always better than the current Big East. They were pillow fights with extra firm pillows.

 

[HoustonVeer]

TCU's schedule was ranked 76th by Sagarin in 2010. Those who live in glass houses . . .

 

[weklfrog]

TCU's schedule was ranked 76th by Sagarin in 2010. Those who live in glass houses . . .

so we had a tougher schedule, finished with a better record and had a marque victory over 5/6 ranked Utah.

 

[Aloha Frog]

TCU's schedule was ranked 76th by Sagarin in 2010. Those who live in glass houses . . .

9/1/12: Texas State 30; Houston 13

Enough said from HoustonVeer.

 

[Smooth42]

Our schedule ranks were 60's and 70's, undefeated, with 2 top 30 victories, with the highest winning margin in country and oh yeah 6 prolific nfl players.

 

[Smooth42]

Louisville and NIU have no nfl talent. Case closed.