Thank you, more succinct and tells me what’s on your mind.Eat a bag of dicks.
If we had a decent line we could pay a less talented QB less than half as much and still be at least this mediocre.How does Hoover command $2.4 million in NIL money? Is that the going rate because that seems like a WHOLE lot for what we are getting. Just wondering. Are we spending the money in the places we should be and not heavy on one guy? I guess not.
Thank you, more succinct and tells me what’s on your mind.
Didn’t require chat gpt to write up a bunch of words that mean squat. Did it create a model for you to gamble your money away too? It sure hasn’t helped your football eye, I see you’re still pushing the notion that we’re “almost” undefeated. Great, and we’re also almost 4–5 against 8 below average teams.
Actual footage of Froggy Style...
![]()
Wex is a harmless internet warrior. He takes a position and then argues it into the ground. Lots of people said we would likely lose three or four of our final games and Wex tried to troll them all of last week. Then disappeared when our coaches got their pants pulled down on Saturday. He’s trying to make it about GP vs Sonny or just TCU accepting mediocrity.So if he is Don Quixote, does that make you the inanimate object that should just be ignored?
For 2.4 million you could probably have a very very good OL and use Seals. I personally think Barnes is a very good RB (when healthy), and with a better OL and run blocking capability we’d be much better off than paying one guy who is average that much dough.The market will adjust as more information becomes available. Right now, $2.4 million feels like a lot, especially when your program has multiple needs and other programs are competing for the same resources. Eventually, there’s going to be a Moneyball effect in all of this. Maybe quarterbacks will continue to command millions on a regular basis, but there will be statistical inefficiencies to exploit.
For example, in the NFL, running backs aren’t highly paid, outside of a few, they’re considered interchangeable. Yet in fantasy football, their value is often higher because of how point utilization works. I think NIL economics will eventually follow a similar pattern.
Hey hey now. Purdue is a basketball schoolI heard that they actually sold 100% of Purdue...
(It's a joke)
Wex is a harmless internet warrior. He takes a position and then argues it into the ground. Lots of people said we would likely lose three or four of our final games and Wex tried to troll them all of last week. Then disappeared when our coaches got their pants pulled down on Saturday. He’s trying to make it about GP vs Sonny or just TCU accepting mediocrity.
Truth is, they both are mirroring each other. End of career syndrome trying to get as many million dollar paychecks as possible without knowing how to adjust.
I like ya, but do you need to be so hostile?Eat a bag of dicks.
what the heck is this model y'all keep talking about?I mostly agree about Wex, but he was not who I was referring to. The boy with the model is.
the pub crawl at Purdue is a pretty good one.Hey hey now. Purdue is a basketball school![]()
I think it might be Sonny Cumbie, the one the last coach kept around for about 7 years despite almost comical results at times. Get ready for the jump pass at the goal line!what the heck is this model y'all keep talking about?
and can we use it to predict the new OC?
I thought we’d have only 3 losses this year so they cannot lose another one lol. Wishful thinking.I don’t think we’re very good and didn’t have much hope coming into the season but I ABSOLUTELY believe would would’ve had 2-4 more wins over this year and the last 2 through better coaching decisions.
I also think Sonny lost his arguably two best coaches after that first year when the two recruiting guru studs left for other schools.
An Cap was telling us a few weeks back how smart he was a football, and had created a model to predict scores. We should therefore trust him that our coaches were fine because the model has and continues to to predict 8-4 or better. He also thinks we're just a few plays away from undefeated...and chat gpt wrote up a nice synapsis of the future of NIL for him too (probably made a good little excel gambling model too).what the heck is this model y'all keep talking about?
and can we use it to predict the new OC?
See that now. Thanks.I mostly agree about Wex, but he was not who I was referring to. The boy with the model is.
I don't think he told you how smart he was, or that you should trust him, or that our coaches were fine because whatever, or that we were a few plays from being undefeated. But go on ahead misrepresenting what was said or taking it totally out of context, it's par for the course around here.An Cap was telling us a few weeks back how smart he was a football, and had created a model to predict scores. We should therefore trust him that our coaches were fine because the model has and continues to to predict 8-4 or better. He also thinks we're just a few plays away from undefeated...and chat gpt wrote up a nice synapsis of the future of NIL for him too (probably made a good little excel gambling model too).
Just because I dabble in statistics doesn’t mean I’m some football expert. I’m simply sharing what the numbers say...take it or leave it. Yes, before the season started, my model projected the Frogs to finish 8–4, and that projection has been steady almost every week. Right now, the model still shows that 8 wins is the most likely outcome. That doesn’t guarantee we’ll get there.An Cap was telling us a few weeks back how smart he was a football, and had created a model to predict scores. We should therefore trust him that our coaches were fine because the model has and continues to to predict 8-4 or better. He also thinks we're just a few plays away from undefeated...and chat gpt wrote up a nice synapsis of the future of NIL for him too (probably made a good little excel gambling model too).
Yup there’s a bunch of us that drank the purple koolaid.I thought we’d have only 3 losses this year so they cannot lose another one lol. Wishful thinking.