I wish I could give you %, but I cannot. i.e. 40% for, 60% against.So I read Steaming Pile’s latest hit-piece and found it on par with the rest of his garbage. I also did a little search and saw that the topic has been discussed on the Coaching Hire thread but didn’t reread all 5000 some-odd posts. Since it hasn’t come up this go round, what was the group consensus here on the Kaz hire?
The sides kinda go like this
Pro Kaz: He isn't Briles. All of the faults at the school and program were Briles, so it can't be Kaz. He was vetted, nothing bad about him. Good hire.
scheiss Kaz: If you believe even half of the [ Finebaum ] they put out in the media, no scheissing way that guy should be here. We should mention - Briles himself was given a letter of clearance from the school for any wrong doing. Do you think he did no wrong? So saying Kaz was vetted means little. Hiring Kaz is a straight sell out move and a lowering of our standards.