still early so hard to get a a good gauge on the team overall.
this was the frog's best opponent to date, but how good is uc irvine? i know about the win last year in the tournament, but the loss by 16 to colorado is more intriguing to me than a win a year ago.
as pointed out, the frogs are not big up front and i am a bit concerned when the frogs get into conference we are going to see some struggles with bigger opponents. they are not going to win many games in the big 12 getting beaten on the boards the way they did last night.
who knows with bane what is actually happening, but in this offense is it possible to force the ball to him?
sure seems the origin of much of the offense in the half court offense starts with that high pick and if he drifts to the 3 point line he gets lost at times. that desmond or this offense?
this is not a great shooting team so far and i am a bit concerned we will continue to see the streaks from the outside.
rj's development should help the balance, but when the frogs get in to conference play the others are going to have to step it up if the frogs want to reach the middle of the conference this year.
guess we will get a better feel for this team soon. not sure how good clemson is despite their record but colorado is ranked with double digit conference win and beat uc-irvine by 16.