Do you know how how many people it would take to do a thorough review of every deal? It would be impossible to regulate properly.This has to stop. I don’t understand how it is so difficult to put in guardrails and rules for maxing out compensation in NIL. How can you max out the schools at $20.5M, but 3rd party payments are unlimited? It makes zero sense. What has largely ruined the MLB (especially with the Dodgers), is going to be the ruin of college football.
Trying not to take sides here as I’m a fan of both coaches (and a huge fan of GP), but SD has a fairly significantly better winning percentage as a Big 12 head coach than GP. .673 to .595. And even if you take away GPs last 4 seasons, his winning percentage in the big 12 was just .631.In all fairness, if you want to talk facts, here's one:
A couple of pages ago you said:
The reality is that GP did that 3 times in 10 seasons in the Big 12 (also did it 8 times in 11 seasons pre Big 12, which is obviously different).
So far Sonny has done that once in eight P4/P5 seasons and once in seven seasons in G5.
I don't really have a dog in the fight but to pretend that their accomplishments are remotely similar isn't reasonable. GP outperformed plenty of schools with more talent. Can't say he could do it again but also can't say is impossible to imagine.
Patterson dropped off in his last four (I blame that largely on QB recruiting failures two cycles in a row) but his record clearly puts him in rarified air.
Good news(?), some programs want the cap increased/gone.This has to stop. I don’t understand how it is so difficult to put in guardrails and rules for maxing out compensation in NIL. How can you max out the schools at $20.5M, but 3rd party payments are unlimited? It makes zero sense. What has largely ruined the MLB (especially with the Dodgers), is going to be the ruin of college football.
Good news(?), some programs want the cap increased/gone.
Yeah it's really difficult to fairly compare because of the trade of UT and OU for the teams recently added, the situation they each started in (our first years in the 12 versus NIL years, etc.).Trying not to take sides here as I’m a fan of both coaches (and a huge fan of GP), but SD has a fairly significantly better winning percentage as a Big 12 head coach than GP. .673 to .595. And even if you take away GPs last 4 seasons, his winning percentage in the big 12 was just .631.
I agree that having an 11-win regular season (and the NY6 bowl game that comes with it) followed by a couple of .500 seasons is probably preferable to 3 above average seasons, but even so, GP only had one 11-win regular season in 10 years in the Big 12.Yeah it's really difficult to fairly compare because of the trade of UT and OU for the teams recently added, the situation they each started in (our first years in the 12 versus NIL years, etc.).
I'm just saying that Patterson clearly had more "high" years. And frankly for me it's better to go 6-6 for a couple years and then 11-1 than going 8-4 three years in a row.
And it’s kind of disingenuous to throw the four seasons at Cal in there when comparing how many “10-win seasons” they’ve had in a P4/P5 league. I think they’ve had three such seasons at Cal in the last 50 years, and they’ve never had an 11-win season. It’s just a really hard place to build a winner, for obvious reasons. And beyond that it was a terrible fit for a guy from West Texas. It’s be like GP coaching at Stanford or Boston College.Yeah it's really difficult to fairly compare because of the trade of UT and OU for the teams recently added, the situation they each started in (our first years in the 12 versus NIL years, etc.).
I'm just saying that Patterson clearly had more "high" years. And frankly for me it's better to go 6-6 for a couple years and then 11-1 than going 8-4 three years in a row.
OK sure, but before Franchione (one year) and Patterson (eleven years) started cranking out 10 win seasons, TCU had none in the previous 60 years. Patterson moved the program back up to P4 and had 3 more 10 win seasons.And it’s kind of disingenuous to throw the four seasons at Cal in there when comparing how many “10-win seasons” they’ve had in a P4/P5 league. I think they’ve had three such seasons at Cal in the last 50 years, and they’ve never had an 11-win season. It’s just a really hard place to build a winner, for obvious reasons.
aka Blinn-dergarten.It seems like Blinn College’s relationship with TAMU. Like a feeder school for students that aren’t ready
That’s fair. GP became head coach of a program that had struggled mightily for about 38 years until Fran and GP’s defense did 1998. Sonny took over a program in 2022 and took them to the NC game his first year. So the cupboard was not bare. Gary proved himself over 21 years with six top 10 and six additional top 25 finishes. Pretty stout for TCU based on our long drought. Sonny has one top 25 in his career, #2 in 2022. Seems a good guy and also very professional. I like this years off season approach. Time will tell.Trying not to take sides here as I’m a fan of both coaches (and a huge fan of GP), but SD has a fairly significantly better winning percentage as a Big 12 head coach than GP. .673 to .595. And even if you take away GPs last 4 seasons, his winning percentage in the big 12 was just .631.
I was wondering the same thing.Can someone please explain to me why we have not heard a whisper about the TCU GM's wins/losses during the T Portal??? I've thoroughly checked out at least 17 other CFB boards and they mention their GM's accomplishments.
We gotta remember Bumpas in this exchange. He was a man behind the curtain for the defense until he retired in Feb. 2015.That’s fair. GP became head coach of a program that had struggled mightily for about 38 years until Fran and GP’s defense did 1998.