My point is that typically playing one less conference game (and the top typically winning all of their OOC games), they will all have a +1 in the win category, I.e if the middle of your conference is 8-4 instead of 7-5, people are going to be like “see, they’re better”. But also, that late season cupcake - we all know that late season losses are more detrimental than early. So while half of the big 12 (or Pac 12) was taking an L on the second to last weekend, 99% of the SEC was winning.
however, the SEC has gone to 9 conf this year, so it’ll be interesting to see how this works out.
Half the teams are obviously going to have an extra loss, assuming they would have won the alternative game, which in teams like Florida and Arkansas case last year, would not have automatically been the case.
My point is that people see an 9-3 team and assume they are better than a 7-5 team. They most assuredly will be ranked higher. But what kind of record would BYU have had last year had they played a typical SEC schedule? I know these were a bit of outliers, but Florida played LSU, Texas, Texas A&M, Georgia, Ole Miss and Tennessee last year (and Miami in OOC!).
Oklahoma played Michigan, Texas, Ole Miss, Tennessee, Alabama, Missouri....finishes the season 10-2 and is only ranked four spots higher than BYU. Seriously, had BYU had to play all those teams, how many are they winning? They played one really good team twice and got blown out both times (unless you want to call Utah really good, who they beat by 3 at home), and had really close calls against the like of Colorado and Arizona.