ESPN

[D_Frog]

Just caught the end of College Sports Live talking about Winners and Loser of this entire mess so I didn't see their explanation. They had in the loser column, Pac10, MWC, Boise St. They had Utah in winner column.

Is it official Utah it going to Pac10?

 

[MN Frog]

I saw it too. They said Utah was a winner because they were likely going to join the Pac 10, at least according to Joe Schad (haven't yet to my knowledge). Had Boise as a loser because they moved to a conference that is losing Utah. His reasoning didn't make sense and Rod Gilmore disagreed with him and mentioned that MWC was better competition and he considered them a winner.

He also had the MWC as a loser for some reason I can't remember...

 

[Fred Garvin]

Any list of "losers" needs to have Baylor Football at the top of the list or it isn't a real list.

 

[KillerFrog InD KitchenSink]

Really don't think we are a loser. Disappointed, yes, since there were a lot of winner scenarios, but loser, no. BCS resume is basically the same as it was a week ago, and now it looks like the new steady state will have a 10 team Big 12, so the league is at less risk for poaching now. We pretty much are status quo.