InterestedObserver
Active Member
Big 12 transfer rules have always been that a player has to sit 2 years to transfer within conference. Not sure if that's changed with the shifts the last couple of years, but doubt it.
Not a chance Applewhite takes Baylor or Rice job! 0%
Applewhite already coached at Rice once and was out the door so fast it wasn't even funny! He is prob going to be the next coach in waiting at UT and then eventually take over for Mack. Applewhite won't be able to turn around UT after Mack finishes running the program into the ground. He'll get a 2-3 season and then get replaced with Chis Simms. Ha ha.
Brown mentioned unconditional release. Regardless I don see any of them interested here. Oversteer and Daje would have to switch positions. MB is intriguing but i think he wants a diff conference via aggy.Big 12 transfer rules have always been that a player has to sit 2 years to transfer within conference. Not sure if that's changed with the shifts the last couple of years, but doubt it.
Brown mentioned unconditional release. Regardless I don see any of them interested here. Oversteer and Daje would have to switch positions. MB is intriguing but i think he wants a diff conference via aggy.
You may be right, but your assertions defy widespread rumors regarding Applewhite's supposed major interest in he Rice HC job.
Big 12 transfer rules have always been that a player has to sit 2 years to transfer within conference. Not sure if that's changed with the shifts the last couple of years, but doubt it.
Briles isn't going anywhere. At Baylor, he has everything he needs to win and about 10% of the headaches he would at a school like Arky.
Plus, the guy has essentially never left the state of Texas and with the exception of Houston every coaching job he's had (high school and college) has been a few hours drive from his hometown. He's a Texas guy and I just don't see him wanting to leave the state.
Houston and Fayetteville are both 7 hrs from his hometown, if that's the rule (rock me).
Just sayin'.
Yes, but Arkansas isn't Texas - not even close. That's more to my point and I included the Houston exception in my statement.
I think you may be from the midwest based on what I've gathered (correct me if I'm wrong), but to some native Texans living in Texas is a big deal. Maybe not enough to keep some from taking employment in another state, but a big deal to many.
Yes I am but I've also been here longer (going on 30 years). So I'm kinda familiar with how things roll around here. There's also a significant portion who doesn't like to admit Houston is part of Texas, either.
Are you sure you're familiar with how things roll around here? I've never heard this.
Yes I am but I've also been here longer (going on 30 years). So I'm kinda familiar with how things roll around here. There's also a significant portion who doesn't like to admit Houston is part of Texas, either. I'm not saying he's definitely going or not, but given his obvious wanderlust, even if he's managed to stay inside the state line (so far), I'm not convinced lines on a map are a deterrent. If he stays at Baylor, I think it'll have more to do with the obvious pitfalls of the UArk job than geography.
But I live in Arlington, and rather enjoy it, so what do I know.
Houston has way too many Yankees to be Texan, so Texas-yes; Texan-not even close ;-)
Yes I am but I've also been here longer (going on 30 years). So I'm kinda familiar with how things roll around here. There's also a significant portion who doesn't like to admit Houston is part of Texas, either. I'm not saying he's definitely going or not, but given his obvious wanderlust, even if he's managed to stay inside the state line (so far), I'm not convinced lines on a map are a deterrent. If he stays at Baylor, I think it'll have more to do with the obvious pitfalls of the UArk job than geography.
But I live in Arlington, and rather enjoy it, so what do I know.
Houston has way too many Yankees to be Texan, so Texas-yes; Texan-not even close ;-)

