Were they "favored" because they were a blueblood or because they had a better record while playing a more difficult schedule, and won their league title outright?This isn't about us or baylor. This is about bias in favor of bluebloods and I was using michigan vs. michigan state as an example. Not sure why you keep going to 2014. If anything the Big 12 omission from the invitational that year only proves my point - that ohio state, a blueblood, was favored and got in over us and baylor.
I didn't realize you knew what people wanted. Glad you can speak for everyone. I would like to see a real playoff system. resumes are not requirements of a real playoff system. This is unlikely, given the fractured nature of FBS football. Just a bunch of conferences looking out for themselves.
They've also NOT made the playoffs with a 11-1 and 12-1 record on separate occasions. Was that because they were a blueblood or because some other team had a better record while playing a more difficult schedule, and won their league title outright?