TxFrog1999
The Man Behind The Curtain
-- waiting to see if Reddit asks their investigation questions...
This is going to be a disaster of a rule. Imo if an official misses the call or it takes a review to be sure the call is correct, then stop the clock, review it, get it right. No need to penalize a team by an officials need to review. Maybe I'm not fully understanding the point, but for me, this is something derived in a room full of job justifiers.Okay, further explanation on this rule change.
Situation - 4th quarter 17 seconds left, QB rolling out and as he's being tackled he gets the ball off and it's incomplete. On replay his knee was down before releasing the ball. The clock should not have stopped and it is reversed as a sack. Since the clock did stop (incomplete) the clock will be reset to the time his knee was down then a 10 second run off will occur. They explained it as 10 seconds is the average amount of time a team would take to reset. He did not mention if a time out could be used to save the runoff, but given how other run off rules work I think that is the case.
Burks was pretty clear that they'd rather let a play continue than prematurely or wrongly call a player down when replay can reverse it and get it right. The issue here is in the case where a call was wrong and overturned that results in what would have been a running clock is now stopped the offense will keep the stopped clock but incur a 10 second run off to represent the time it would take for the team to reset before the next snap. Again, I'm assuming a timeout could be used to preserve the 10 second run off, but he didn't go into that.This is going to be a disaster of a rule. Imo if an official misses the call or it takes a review to be sure the call is correct, then stop the clock, review it, get it right. No need to penalize a team by an officials need to review. Maybe I'm not fully understanding the point, but for me, this is something derived in a room full of job justifiers.
Gotcha. Obviously they've done their research on the :10 time, and it makes sense I suppose. Just know how shippy that's going to be when that runoff kills a half or worse, ends the game if no timeouts are left to be offered up.Burks was pretty clear that they'd rather let a play continue than prematurely or wrongly call a player down when replay can reverse it and get it right. The issue here is in the case where a call was wrong and overturned that results in what would have been a running clock is now stopped the offense will keep the stopped clock but incur a 10 second run off to represent the time it would take for the team to reset before the next snap. Again, I'm assuming a timeout could be used to preserve the 10 second run off, but he didn't go into that.
Completely agree.Gotcha. Obviously they've done their research on the :10 time, and it makes sense I suppose. Just know how shippy that's going to be when that runoff kills a half or worse, ends the game if no timeouts are left to be offered up.