Fan Nation
Forums
Forum list
Search forums
Rules & Policies
Podcast
Mobile App
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Shop
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forum list
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Horned Frog Athletics
Scott & Wes Frog Fan Forum
Bearing the brunt of two Kansas schools
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="This Ain't Chopped Liver" data-source="post: 3170259" data-attributes="member: 74137"><p>From Stewart Mandel’s article in The Athletic—</p><p>Below is a chart of the remaining Pac-12 and Big 12 schools’ average TV ratings, from 2015-19 and 2021. (Games against Oklahoma/Texas and USC/UCLA are excluded.)</p><p>[ATTACH=full]11736[/ATTACH]</p><p>[ATTACH=full]11735[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>[USER=74130]@TXTXFrog[/USER] [USER=4921]@Froglaw[/USER] [USER=785]@froginaustin[/USER] [USER=778]@Endless Purple[/USER]</p><p>Two Power 5 schools in the small state of Kansas doesn’t work, they are both at the bottom of the Big XII. Add their two numbers together and you are at 1.16 million which would appropriately represent one P5 school in the state of Kansas and the Big XII. That combined number would be good for third place in the Big XII behind TCU at 1.22. <strong> One P5 school</strong> <strong>representing</strong> the state and conference <strong>becomes a relative TV financial strength</strong> for the conference <strong>instead of the conference bearing the brunt of two weaklings (<u><em>times two, not simply one, but two, two of the current eight, that is 1/4 ! </em></u>) which burdens the TV deal for the Big XII. </strong>Turn Kansas into a football TV conference asset, instead of a football financial burden.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="This Ain't Chopped Liver, post: 3170259, member: 74137"] From Stewart Mandel’s article in The Athletic— Below is a chart of the remaining Pac-12 and Big 12 schools’ average TV ratings, from 2015-19 and 2021. (Games against Oklahoma/Texas and USC/UCLA are excluded.) [ATTACH type="full" alt="1659287232969.png"]11736[/ATTACH] [ATTACH type="full" alt="1659286310211.png"]11735[/ATTACH] [USER=74130]@TXTXFrog[/USER] [USER=4921]@Froglaw[/USER] [USER=785]@froginaustin[/USER] [USER=778]@Endless Purple[/USER] Two Power 5 schools in the small state of Kansas doesn’t work, they are both at the bottom of the Big XII. Add their two numbers together and you are at 1.16 million which would appropriately represent one P5 school in the state of Kansas and the Big XII. That combined number would be good for third place in the Big XII behind TCU at 1.22. [B] One P5 school[/B] [B]representing[/B] the state and conference [B]becomes a relative TV financial strength[/B] for the conference [B]instead of the conference bearing the brunt of two weaklings ([U][I]times two, not simply one, but two, two of the current eight, that is 1/4 ! [/I][/U]) which burdens the TV deal for the Big XII. [/B]Turn Kansas into a football TV conference asset, instead of a football financial burden. [/QUOTE]
Verification
Which team did TCU defeat in the College Football Playoffs?
Post reply
Forums
Horned Frog Athletics
Scott & Wes Frog Fan Forum
Bearing the brunt of two Kansas schools
Top