The original ArgyleFrog
Full Member
cdsfrog said:
wrong.... ESPN will get turnt up and report even more
Another week, another victim. ESPN Outside the Lines: Baylor didn't investigate sex assault claim a
- Thread starter TCUdirtbag
- Start date
wrong.... ESPN will get turnt up and report even more
cdsfrog
Active Member
ArgyleFrog2010 said:
Hope so. I just don't buy it. It should justify more coverage as this is basically Baylor confirming how bad the atrocities are.
If you fire Starr for this, there should be no way for Briles or the Ad to survive. But winning football matters more to Baylor than protecting victims of rape.
East Coast
Tier 1
Well, the AD could survive if there is proof he wanted to suspend or kick players off the team, and he was overruled by Starr...other than that, I'd have to agree with you...
Pharm Frog
Full Member
Rush Limbaugh taking up the topic.
Purple Riff
Member
The media will not let this go. This will only make things worse..
Purple Riff
Member
More attempts at misdirection to save Briles and Baylor football.. How many failed attempts will it take before they learn how to handle this situation?frognutz said:
rifram09
Active Member
If Tressel can be fired for tattoo-gate, how do we not have enough info to fire Briles--like yesterday.TCURiggs said:
I would have to research what actions or omissions traditionally meet the meaning of "for cause," but I would be shocked if there is enough to fire Starr but not Briles.
Mean Purple
Active Member
Correct. There's likely enough to fire both of them.Rifram09 said:
Baylor may not be worried about wrongful termination. They are likely more worried about the legal action from the vicitms. They can already fire Briles for the recruiting violations they got clipped for last season.
texas_sicilian
Full Member
Pulled from Reddit, so take this post from a user with a grain of salt:
"The feeling is if the board got rid of Art (Briles), they'd be sitting in a $300 million mausoleum instead of that new football stadium," one source close to the situation told HD."
"The feeling is if the board got rid of Art (Briles), they'd be sitting in a $300 million mausoleum instead of that new football stadium," one source close to the situation told HD."
researchfrog
Active Member
That came from the Longhorns (HD = Horns Digest). And, unless there are massive, unreported NCAA violations OR the team is so undisciplined that the Chad Morrises of the world are unwilling to at least use it as a stepping stone job, then it is malarkey. There are tons of coaches who would take the pay raise and use the good facilities and talented roster as a stepping stone or a low pressure job. IOW, I see it as an admission that they know their recruiting is dirty or their team would revolt against a new coach.
GuardianFrog
Tier 1
You would think it would dawn on them that Briles isn't worth this headache, and that 300 million dollar stadium could go a long way toward hiring a quality new coach who isn't a complete POS human.texas_sicilian said:
