TCUdirtbag
Active Member
GeorgeLanescaddy said:My definition of a thug are people that perform violent acts, the keyword is violent acts. In my "thug" category I include the original American thugs who are Italian, Jewish, and Irish mobsters. Now we have Middle Eastern and Asian thugs, as well as, Black, White, and Hispanic thugs. They all partake in illegal and violent behavior. Therefore thugs don't only apply to young black men that perform violent acts. There is an annoying fabricated assumption that any white person using the word "thug" is a bigot and racist. If someone wants to believe that a white person using the word "thug" equates to a shadow racist be my guest but to normal people you sound insane.
Your definition of "thug" could be a tomato for all I care, but no one cares about anyone's personal definition of anything. The popular understanding of many word's meanings change from decade to decade. There are plenty of examples of this. In today's American culture, "thug" is more often than not used to negatively describe young black men (with no regard to their actual actions). I don't care if people want to be crude or offensive or make a point or whatever. You do you. But functioning members of American society should reasonably understand that the modern meaning of "thug" (particularly in context of a topic discussion involving black college football players like Tevin Elliott, Sam Ukwuachu and Shawn Oakman) is unquestionably racially charged language. So referring to "thug athletes" is poor form and charged with racial meaning.
I'm sure the anti-PC police (who are just as awful as the miserable PC police) will want to come out of the woodwork for this comment. I can't stand the PC rants or the anti-PC rants. We can all be reasonable and live in the real world. Say what you want among like-minded friends and in your home or whatever. But let's avoid calling black athletes "thugs" on public pro-TCU sports forums. And let's certainly not pretend like we don't know what words mean in 2016.