• The KillerFrogs

247 Sports: TCU 2025 Signing Day HQ

I did not know you could say his name unless you put in the required prefix: “ Nebraska transfer” Aaron Green.
Not sure if the profanity filter will garble this but I will try:

Much like people did not know that Perry Bass’ first name was not “Godd@mnit” because when Sid Richardson called him on the phone, the conversation always started with “Godd@mnit Bass!”
 
How is any of this verifiable? I don’t get the sense that On3 has sources in every athletic department telling them about private
offers being made to private citizens and their parents/reps….the whole thing seems made up.
On3 has a history of publishing garbage NIL data. They’ve been refuted before and have been accused of throwing numbers against the wall for engagement.
 

satis1103

DAOTONPYH EHT LIAH LLA
On3 has a history of publishing garbage NIL data. They’ve been refuted before and have been accused of throwing numbers against the wall for engagement.
The seemingly random jumps and falls from year to year, with no apparent trends, make the statistician sliver of my brain go nuts with red flags. But, I'm not in the NIL industry, maybe it really is like that.
 

SW toad

Active Member
No, we came back at you because I listed who the general manager was at least half a dozen times and you refused to acknowledge I told you who he was.

Currently, Ryan Dorchester is listed as the general manager.
Wow Oh Wow are you gonna start this again?


# 1 Who is Ryan Dorchester.? At a minimum explain his/her circuitous route to TCU .If you are listed that doesn't make you real. [ What the heck? ] has Ryan Dorchester accomplished? What has he/she achieved?

# 2 Who is the person known as Tyler Olker???? Director of Player Personnel.

# 3 The fact that you are saying Dorchester is the GM is Comedy on high HIGH.


ON3,247, DCTF, Heartland sports make no mention of a Ryan Dorchester. Please illuminate us.
 
The seemingly random jumps and falls from year to year, with no apparent trends, make the statistician sliver of my brain go nuts with red flags. But, I'm not in the NIL industry, maybe it really is like that.

On3 also claims that Josh has a $2.9mm deal. Heck, if you divide that by roughly 105 scholarships, you are already at a $28k average per. $10k more than the On3 number, and you would have to assume no one else on the team has a deal except Josh. Doesn’t make sense to me.

I’m sure there are NIL things I don’t understand.
 

Chongo94

Active Member
Wow Oh Wow are you gonna start this again?


# 1 Who is Ryan Dorchester.? At a minimum explain his/her circuitous route to TCU .If you are listed that doesn't make you real. [ What the heck? ] has Ryan Dorchester accomplished? What has he/she achieved?

# 2 Who is the person known as Tyler Olker???? Director of Player Personnel.

# 3 The fact that you are saying Dorchester is the GM is Comedy on high HIGH.


ON3,247, DCTF, Heartland sports make no mention of a Ryan Dorchester. Please illuminate us.


I can’t, I just can’t. I typed out a response to you but since you clearly are in your own little world, it would just sail over your head. I would suggest you search an actual TCU website for once.
 
Last edited:

McFroggin

Active Member
On3 also claims that Josh has a $2.9mm deal. Heck, if you divide that by roughly 105 scholarships, you are already at a $28k average per. $10k more than the On3 number, and you would have to assume no one else on the team has a deal except Josh. Doesn’t make sense to me.

I’m sure there are NIL things I don’t understand.


On3 isn’t accurate, but our relative NIL spend still sucks compared to large schools. We aren’t top 5 in the Big12 either. The program is on the way down.
 
Assuming 15 million of the 20.5 million of a schools Revenue Sharing is committed to football and shared equally with 105 scholarships, then that is $143,000 per scholarship.

Any NIL deal over 600 dollars is submitted to the College Sports Commission and is subject to review by Deloitte and has to make true market sense.

Revenue Sharing: Under the NCAA revenue sharing model, schools can elect to make payments directly to athletes up to $ 20.5 million per year. If a school also commits to increased scholarships than the amount of revenue sharing is reduced dollar for dollar up to $ 2.5 million. So the net revenue sharing cash outlay will likely be $ 18 million for most power conference schools. The annual cap will increase to around $ 32 million over the next ten years.

* Commercial NIL: In addition to school revenue sharing payments, student athletes can continue to receive third-party NIL income for product endorsements, services and other compensation for use of their name, image and likeness. All third-party NIL contracts over $ 600 must be submitted to the College Sports Commission for approval. The estimate for 2025-26 Commercial NIL comes from the Opendorse NIL at Four report.

* NIL Collectives: With the advent of Revenue Sharing, the influence of collectives at most schools has greatly diminished. NIL collectives are also considered third-party entities and contracts exceeding $ 600 must be submitted to the College Sports Commission for approval. The estimate for 2025-26 NIL Collectives also comes from the Opendorse NIL at Four report.
 
Last edited:

At 14:15 Sonny is asked a question about schools spending above the 20.5 Revenue Share and Dykes states he doesn’t understand how universities are publicly stating that they are spending an additional 15, 20 or 25 million above the 20.5 Revenue Share since the rules would seem to prohibit that. He states we are trying to kind-a figure it out and get to the bottom of it.
 
Last edited:
At 14:15 Sonny is asked a question about NIL and states he doesn’t understand how universities are publicly stating that they are spending 15, 20 or 25 million on NIL since the rules would seem to prohibit that. He states we are trying to kind-a figure it out and get to the bottom of it.

This was yesterday, correct? Sonny said something similar months ago. I’d say it’s time to get off the schneid and at least figure out what we can and cannot do.
 
Top