And you know who started that losing streak...
If IKF gets the normal read on that bases loaded grounder back in the 9th…..
Look at how small his lead is? Bro you're the winning run, [ What the heck? ] are you doing?
Look at how small his lead is? Bro you're the winning run, [ What the heck? ] are you doing?
Look at how far away from 3rd Muncy was. It would have took a damn near miracle for IKF to get doubled off. Bases were loaded, gotta be going full speed on contact for anything on the ground. Not scheissing daydreaming about holding the trophy. The ending to Game 6 was just some dumb luck for the Dodgers. Completely different situations.Devil's advocate...you absolutely, 100% cannot get doubled off there. It happened to end Game 6. Maybe he could have gotten more but not much more. My biggest issue is he shouldn't have slid into home. Treat it like 1st base since it was a force out. Run all the way through. Maybe gets there a half step earlier.
Look at how far away from 3rd Muncy was. It would have took a damn near miracle for IKF to get doubled off. Bases were loaded, gotta be going full speed on contact for anything on the ground. Not scheissing daydreaming about holding the trophy. The ending to Game 6 was just some dumb luck for the Dodgers. Completely different situations.
So you honestly think that Muncy could have caught a line drive and beat IKF back to the bag from where they were both lined up when the play started. I get playing it safe but that was just bad base running by IKF.I get what you're saying but for us as armchair quarterbacks, we have no idea how fast the game moves at that level. I'm 100% certain there was a directive from the bench to be conservative with leads, especially given that Toronto is a very contact-heavy team. A team like LA who relies more on the longball probably gets a slightly bigger lead there.