Its easy to think we had a top tier defense and DE isn't that big of an issue, but I believe we gave up 4-5 long TDs last year because either the QB had to much time or we had to sacrifice coverage for a blitzer. When you combine that with have a true freshman at one of the corner spots, I bet the DE cost us a couple of games
in the spirit of board rules and not naming players i think it is safe to say that in the loss to smu (as much as the early turnovers by the offense hurt) the inability to get a pass rush did have an impact in the game.
the iowa state game was ugly in the second half where the frogs couldn't stop the run and there wasn't much of a pass rush on purdy.
the ok state game the failure by the defensive end(s) to close down quick enough hurt on the long runs, and in the losses to kstate, baylor, and wvu the frogs could not get consistent pressure at the end of the game.
yes, for those who automatically take the side of defending the defense, i recognize that actually having some offensive production in those games would have alleviated these problems, but if the ultimate goal of this team is to compete for one of the top two spots to make the championship game the play at defensive end and linebacker has to get better.
linebacker is in better shape not only with wallow, but harris and ben both flashed some potential in some key moments late in the year. harris had the stop against ou and ben made a great open field tackle against the wvu running back just before the 4th down that gladney got flagged to extend the drive
i think is very possible the defense holds the level of play at several plays if not gets better even with losses be it corner with gladney, safety, or defensive tackle if ross leaves. defensive end is a big key from this defense going from being good to being able to play at the level needed to win the big 12