Froglaw
Full Member
Clearly. They'd rather engage in continued hysterics than calmly and rationally examine the physical evidence. I remember a time when there was a thing called the "Scientific Method." A means by which one could examine facts, and, using the observations of those facts, formulate a theory of process by which these facts came to be observed. More experiments and observations were needed to gather more facts, to prove or disprove the theory earlier posited. The more facts gathered and observed, the greater the certainty that the theory was correct.
Now, of course, in this enlightened age, we have "Science!" It is a rhetorical device devoid of what we used to call science, consisting mainly of nebulous pronouncements which rely on some facts, but exclude others, thus rendering the theories posited strange and unwieldy...
Wrong on this one brewing:
"When used in conjunction with widespread testing, contact tracing, quarantining of anyone that may be infected, hand washing, and physical distancing, face masks are a valuable tool to reduce community transmission. All of these measures, through their effect on Re" role="presentation" style="-webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; box-sizing: border-box; display: inline; line-height: normal; word-spacing: normal; word-wrap: normal; white-space: nowrap; float: none; direction: ltr; max-width: none; max-height: none; min-width: 0px; min-height: 0px; border: 0px; padding: 0px; margin: 0px; position: relative;">Re, have the potential to reduce the number of infections. As governments exit lockdowns, keeping transmissions low enough to preserve health care capacity will be critical until a vaccine can be developed."
https://www.pnas.org/content/118/4/e2014564118#sec-22
I agree that this has gotten political. Never should have become a red v. Blue issue.
I look at it like sear belts. Not always comfortable, but what if it works the one time I need it.
Last edited: