CountryFrog
Active Member
I get it. But that's all part of it.This year they could get as much of the Rose Bowl experience if the game was played in Atlanta or Kansas City. Do you really think they’d enjoy the round trip flights to LA?
What I'm saying is that NORMALLY when you get to play in the Rose Bowl then you get a winter trip to SoCal and you get to play in front of 100K in the most historic venue in the sport.
Compared to that going to Arlington to play in front of a half empty Jerry World sucks.
California still had a chance to get some people in the stadium and keep the game and it sucks from the players standpoint that they didn't do it.
Am I just a total scheissing moron for thinking this?