• The KillerFrogs

Looking forward to tomorrow night's game

P

puckster59

Active Member
It was a good game ... until Clemsons offense got the hiccups. Thought it was going to wind up being a 45-42 type finish.

Burrow is obviously talented but there are a number of QBs who’d win the Heisman with that group of receivers. Reminds me a little of 2014. Tre obviously had talent. But he also had a very strong group of receivers who made him look even better.
 
W

Wexahu

Full Member
puckster59 said:
It was a good game ... until Clemsons offense got the hiccups. Thought it was going to wind up being a 45-42 type finish.

Burrow is obviously talented but there are a number of QBs who’d win Heiskanen with that group of receivers. Reminds me a little of 2014. Tre obviously had talent. But he also had a very strong group of receivers who made him look even better.
Click to expand...

He is great in the pocket, runs very well, and he puts the ball right on the money hitting guys in stride so often. I think you’re selling the guy short, he is absolutely the real deal and the reason that machine worked.
 
P

puckster59

Active Member
puckster59 said:
It was a good game ... until Clemsons offense got the hiccups. Thought it was going to wind up being a 45-42 type finish.

Burrow is obviously talented but there are a number of QBs who’d win Heisman with that group of receivers. Reminds me a little of 2014. Tre obviously had talent. But he also had a very strong group of receivers who made him look even better.
Click to expand...
Wexahu said:
He is great in the pocket, runs very well, and he puts the ball right on the money hitting guys in stride so often. I think you’re selling the guy short, he is absolutely the real deal and the reason that machine worked.
Click to expand...
So he would have won a natty with Reagor & Co.?

I didn’t sell him short at all. Just like I wouldn’t suggest Tre had no business winning that many games. But who had close to LSU’s receivers corps this year? Those guys were phenomenal.
 
TooColdU

TooColdU

Active Member
puckster59 said:
So he would have won a natty with Reagor & Co.?

I didn’t sell him short at all. Just like I wouldn’t suggest Tre had no business winning that many games. But who had close to LSU’s receivers corps this year? Those guys were phenomenal.
Click to expand...

Alabama’s WR core is better. They have 4 NFL caliber guys.

With that said, LSU is a close 2nd
 
W

Wexahu

Full Member
puckster59 said:
So he would have won a natty with Reagor & Co.?

I didn’t sell him short at all. Just like I wouldn’t suggest Tre had no business winning that many games. But who had close to LSU’s receivers corps this year? Those guys were phenomenal.
Click to expand...

A "natty"? (god, that term is nails on the chalkboard for me). No, he wouldn't have, it takes more than one guy to win a "natty". But he would take any team and make them much, much better. The guy played incredible football this year.
 
Ron Swanson

Ron Swanson

Full Member
Burrow was incredible all year. You couldn’t watch that game and tell me he was just some product of a system with fantastic wide receivers. Yes his receivers are amazing, but he was amazingly accurate and also incredibly clutch when it came to running as well. I would have zero issue if my NFL team was drafting number one overall and took him as their franchise quarterback
 
jake102

jake102

Active Member
Ron Swanson said:
Burrow was incredible all year. You couldn’t watch that game and tell me he was just some product of a system with fantastic wide receivers. Yes his receivers are amazing, but he was amazingly accurate and also incredibly clutch when it came to running as well. I would have zero issue if my NFL team was drafting number one overall and took him as their franchise quarterback
Click to expand...

He can read the blitz/pocket and is incredibly accurate. Probably the two most difficult things to teach
 

Latest posts

Top