But don’t you think Oregon and Georgia kind of had their chance to make the playoffs and prove they are worthy. Georgia just got dominated yesterday in a game they had every incentive to win. Why is giving them another shot necessary?
fairly simple to me and i have said it multiple times in this thread.
i do not like people removed from the game making a decision about who win a title based upon opinion.
college football at this level is the last sport to decide a title based upon opinion instead of play on the field.
there is not going to be a perfect system, but in my mind it is better to decide the champion based upon performance instead of opinions. you can get too big, heck the basketball tournament has gotten too big a long time ago which is why i don't want to go above 8
each year we get in a stupid argument not about the 1st spot, but the freaking 4th spot. if oregon doesn't schedule auburn in a preseason game they have the same record and resume as ou. 1-loss, when a conference championship and have an ugly loss.
so you reward the team that scheduled an easier non-conference schedule and i am freaking tired of arguments about the strongest or weakest conferences
each conference winner gets in, you need 3 more teams to round it out, play the games at the homes of the conference winners to reward them and go from there.
perfect? far from it, but so much of the discussion about the current system is trivial, contrived bull [ Finebaum ] and we still are subject to the opinion of people who have nothing at stake