Screenshot of the overturned TD in OT

[Zubaz]

Here's the same shot, with a transparent line along the sideline for reference. His foot is pretty clearly over, there's even some over the line.

Now, that's a fairly low resolution shot, and obviously the replay isn't photoshopping an image for reference. I think from an objective standpoint they got it right. Key word, "think". The question is whether they made the right decision given the information they had at the time and had enough "indisputable" evidence at the time.

 

[Moose Stuff]

I get it. But two wins it. We didn’t have the line for it.

We had the line for it on the previous series so the point you’re trying to make while semi-witty in the context of the thread is absurd.

 

[netty2424]

Seems like Max got a lot of yardage on the non-scoring scoring play. We act like we have an inept offense 100% of the time but that ineptitude did outgain BU

And how’d that work out for us?

 

[Moose Stuff]

View attachment 6466
Here's the same shot, with a transparent line along the sideline for reference. His foot is pretty clearly over, there's even some over the line.

Now, that's a fairly low resolution shot, and obviously the replay isn't photoshopping an image for reference. I think from an objective standpoint they got it right. Key word, "think". The question is whether they made the right decision given the information they had at the time and had enough "indisputable" evidence at the time.

LMAO....... it’s not even close to CLEARLY anything.

 

[Pharm Frog]

View attachment 6466
Here's the same shot, with a transparent line along the sideline for reference. His foot is pretty clearly over, there's even some over the line.

Now, that's a fairly low resolution shot, and obviously the replay isn't photoshopping an image for reference. I think from an objective standpoint they got it right. Key word, "think". The question is whether they made the right decision given the information they had at the time and had enough "indisputable" evidence at the time.

excellent post proving they shouldn’t have overturned the call on the field

 

[frogs9497]

View attachment 6466
Here's the same shot, with a transparent line along the sideline for reference. His foot is pretty clearly over, there's even some over the line.

Now, that's a fairly low resolution shot, and obviously the replay isn't photoshopping an image for reference. I think from an objective standpoint they got it right. Key word, "think". The question is whether they made the right decision given the information they had at the time and had enough "indisputable" evidence at the time.

C’mon... this is [ deposit from a bull that looks like Art Briles ].

 

[Zubaz]

LMAO....... it’s not even close to CLEARLY anything.

Here, maybe this is a little clearer.


Again, low resolution shot so you have some blur on the sideline.

 

[Volare]

Hardly their only error of the day. Officiating today was abysmal.

 

[Pharm Frog]

And how’d that work out for us?

shows that it was not IMPOSSIBLE to convert a two point conversion as suggested. In fact Sewo trucked three defenders and got in from similar distance on a very poorly blocked play previously

 

[tcumaniac]

College football has lost control of instant relay and it’s ruining the game.

Instant replay was designed to correct blatantly incorrect calls. Not to give a replay official sitting in a booth the freedom to over turn a call based on a hunch when something is a toss up.

There’s a reason “indisputable evidence” is such a big deal and a tie is supposed to go to the original call on the field.

Overturning a play like that is absolutely disgraceful and misses the entire point of instant replay.

If a replay requires more than looking at it for 5 seconds, go with the call on the field. Spending 10 minutes freezing the frame, zooming in, and trying to decide if a white blade of grass touched his foot or not is downright ridiculous.

 

[frogs9497]

Here, maybe this is a little clearer.
View attachment 6467

Again, low resolution shot so you have some blur on the sideline.

And who’s drawing the red line?

 

[netty2424]

We had the line for it on the previous series so the point you’re trying to make while semi-witty in the context of the thread is absurd.

Ok so you can pick a series it worked, and I’ll point out one it didn’t? We’ll just disagree on this one.

 

[Moose Stuff]

Here, maybe this is a little clearer.
View attachment 6467

Again, low resolution shot so you have some blur on the sideline.

Thats an oddly shaped shoe you’ve created there. Trying way too hard.

 

[Mean Purple]

I don't think it matters.

We had first and goal from inside the 5 yard line and even got an extra first down with the penalty and still could not get in.

well, other than he actually scored and they reversed it.

 

[Moose Stuff]

Ok so you can pick a series it worked, and I’ll point out one it didn’t? We’ll just disagree on this one.

Well you said it was INSURMOUNTABLE. Clearly it wasn’t. I’m fully OK with you “disagreeing” just understand that you’re 100% wrong.

 

[Mean Purple]

If I had to bet everything I own on it I’d say a fraction of a millimeter of his foot was probably out. But what I’ve seen sure as hell isn’t indisputable.

I think the refs ignore the indisputable part sometimes and go by what they suspect might be right.

https://forum.killerfrogs.com/index...-for-beer-edition.222505/page-86#post-2792775

 

[Zubaz]

Thays an oddly shaped shoe you’ve created there. Trying way too hard.

?? I didn't do anything to the shoe, that's from the pic from OP (which was *checks thread*.....you). I drew a straight line, then when you said that wasn't clear I removed some of the line to show where where the shoe is in relation to that line.

If your position is the original pic is bad, as I've said it's difficult to tell with a low-res shot.

 

[Moose Stuff]

https://forum.killerfrogs.com/index...-for-beer-edition.222505/page-86#post-2792775

Hard to say what that proves.

 

[Moose Stuff]

?? I didn't do anything to the shoe, that's from the pic from OP (which was *checks thread*.....you). I drew a straight line, then when you said that wasn't clear I removed some of the line to show where where the shoe is in relation to that line.

If your position is the original pic is bad, as I've said it's difficult to tell with a low-res shot.

My position is that it’s isn’t indisputable and nothing you’ve posted has changed that at all. I’m assuming you know what indisputable means.

 

[tetonfrog]

Yes, we got screwed on that call.

Yes, we would have found a way to lose the game any way.