He would be if they ran him on more slants, “training film”, Alabama, LSU and OSU, Oklahoma, burn up the middle field.
We just so rarely use the middle of the field. That has been the case for the last decade. It's very frustrating.
He would be if they ran him on more slants, “training film”, Alabama, LSU and OSU, Oklahoma, burn up the middle field.
I’m out on RS players unless they are trench players...The odds of getting a kid to last 5 years are getting lower and lower everyday. Injuries, discontent, grades, whatever..Skill players that can play...should play.....
I’m out on RS players unless they are trench players...The odds of getting a kid to last 5 years are getting lower and lower everyday. Injuries, discontent, grades, whatever..Skill players that can play...should play.....
Believe Demarcado got hurt in the game and that’s why Barlow came inIf I had a crystal ball I think it would say one of our top 3 RBs has to miss a game or 2 and Barlow gets elevated.
I really think the coaches probably figured having to use Barlow for more than 4 games this year...just my opinion...
I’m just happy I’m no longer terrified like in previous years to find out what it might look like if our 3rd/4th/5th RB has to play.These 2 kids are equal in my eyes. Would love for both to get 4 games in this year... however, It's inevitable that one is needed, considering the beating RBs receive.
We just so rarely use the middle of the field. That has been the case for the last decade. It's very frustrating.
GP gave me the impression that they would use just one Fr RB per game, giving 8 games to get them in and still keep their redshirts. So Foster was not a surprise, but Barlow was.
Good to see Foster breaking tackles like he did in his HS highlights. Of course that was against Kansas, but they seem better this year: Just ask Boston College.
Anyway, what do you think are the odds that one or both or their redshirts are burned this year? Only 5 appearances left between the two.