Froggish
Active Member
I have a yes/sorta agreement on this, as it goes with the Frogs ... in 2014. It was SOMEWHAT situational regarding balance that year. Yes, it was mostly passing, but it was also who was open and how far down field. There were games where we ran the ball quite a bit. Looking through the ESPN page on 2014, you can view it be game by clicking on the game score and checking team stats/player stats.
https://www.espn.com/college-football/team/schedule/_/id/2628/season/2014
Which is probably the safest way to do it, as I am not sure how accurate the info below is.
https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/schools/texas-christian/2014.html
Again, what is the situation/game seems to tie in.
Furthermore, I suggest approaching all overall stat summaries with the Padraig Harrington warning: Some people use statistics like a drunk uses a lamp post; to lean on rather than for illumination.
I think the main issue for me with that offense had one speed and one cadence about it. It was seemingly only effective playing in hyper speed and it couldn’t adjust well situationally. It also was terrible behind the chains. A 3rd and long might as well have been a punt as the routs and reads were short and quick. If you could get up quick then it was effective but it really stunk at efficiency