Imagine trying to rank defensive players accurately. There's so much less data tracked.
For a real challenge, try to find out stats for the players at your local high school for: total tackles, solo tackles, sacks, hurries, tackles for loss, passes defended, interceptions, forced fumbles, & fumble recoveries.
Despite how the "experts" rank these guys, it's obvious that TCU gets a better defensive class than UT every year.
i think the biggest issue with trying to rank defensive recruits is a good number of the recruiting "experts" don't have the ability to accurate project the players 2-3 years done the road once they get to college let alone in a specific school's system.
one advantage someone like jeremy does have in this area is he has been around tcu long enough and had access to patterson and the staff that he has a good idea what they are looking for at various positions.
some perspective on the challenge of projecting if you look at the frogs classes from 2012 to 2018 and break them out in defensive positions you can see where even for the staff it is tough to project players.
defensive tackle has the highest hit rate which makes sense as chris bradley really is the only undersized prospect they have recruited since joining the big 12.
defensive end is next with roughly half the recruits panning out. 2012 at defensive end the frogs class included devonte fields, james mcfarland, terrell lathan, and josh carraway. if only every position had a year like that one.
no surprise safety has a pretty good rate of success, but you do have factor in the players who have been flipped to other positions.
the position with highest miss rate? when you consider the difficulty of what tcu ask from the players at this position it should be no surprise the struggle at linebacker.
hopefully that changes as tcu is recruiting a different type of athlete in this position the past two seasons.
finally, corner has had a fairly high miss rate, but when the frogs have hit they have been very good (i.e texada, gladney, and lewis).