FROG PARENTS 1961
Active Member
Not sure what the scheiss that is I do get many espns and lots of extra sports chanels never seen an overhead yet but ThanksESPN 3 or WatchESPN, whatever it's called now.
Edit: best part is no broadcast crew!
Not sure what the scheiss that is I do get many espns and lots of extra sports chanels never seen an overhead yet but ThanksESPN 3 or WatchESPN, whatever it's called now.
Edit: best part is no broadcast crew!
and I'll be following you as you look over our offensive and defensive setsNot sure what the [ darn ] that is I do get many espns and lots of extra sports chanels never seen an overhead yet but Thanks
It's internet only. I just started watching a replay of the game myself. You can watch on a computer or mobile device.and I'll be following you as you look over our offensive and defensive sets
We have Big 12 depth now just hope we don't have to keep using it. Even if a team goes undefeated they are still playing the Big 12 championship for the 13'th data point and to play on championship weekend like all the other conferences. The one benefit of not having two divisions is our one versus two championship match-up will be two highly ranked teams more than other conferences anyway. Bad news is runner up could easily beat the number one team and screw the Big 12 out of CFP. We really should add two teams and go to divisions.
Ty is doing what Patterson has asked him to do. He's at the d-end position but half the time he's standing up at the line and covering the running back in the flat. He's definitely a LB / DE hybrid.Ty has struggled at DE. Remember in camp when GP said he was all over the QB during practice..well that hasn't been the case in games thus far. Outside of Howard, our LB play has been a little uneven. I think as we get into some ground attack teams he has more value in the middle. I'd like his strength at LB against a team like K-State and OU who are going to come down hill at us for 4Qts.
These are all good points. Our turnover margin last year was -4 on the year. We are at +2 right now.Surprisingly we are giving up a yard more per play this year than last year, barely inside the top 100. Seems like we are playing better but I think it really shows how important it is to have an effective offense. Okie Light scored 31 on us last year and this year and those two games couldn't have been more different as to who was the dominant aggressor.
It's fun to lead the nation in 3rd down conversions. Led the country most of the year in 2014 too. Sure makes the defense seem better too.
It's stupid to have a championship game with only 1 division. This is the exact excuse the CFPC will use when the runner up beats the conference champion and now both have at least 1 loss apiece so no final 4. We're out again and Bowlsby just got a renewed contract to 2025.
Why don't we let that scenario play out first? A likelihood of a 1-loss winner of the Big 12 Championship game getting left out of the CFP is miniscule as best.
Still don't agree, 1 loss is not as good as 0 losses from another Power 5 conf. And, if it were to come down to us having 1 loss and Ohio State having 1 loss, who do you think get's in? If we go undefeated in conf, play and then lose the championship game, why put yourself at an unnecessary risk situation when you don't have to?
Of course 0 losses is better than 1 loss. But how many times have we had more than two teams with 0 losses? Ohio State with 1-loss is not getting in ahead of a 1-loss Big 12 champion this year. It's not going to happen. Oklahoma's thrashing in Columbus took care of that. The Big 12 champion will either be OU, or a team that has beaten OU at least once. That'll get them the nod over OSU.
My guess is they'd both get in but OSU isn't getting in at the expense of a Big 12 team if they both have one loss. I'll bet you anything you want on that.
30 million reasonsStill don't agree, 1 loss is not as good as 0 losses from another Power 5 conf. And, if it were to come down to us having 1 loss and Ohio State having 1 loss, who do you think get's in? If we go undefeated in conf, play and then lose the championship game, why put yourself at an unnecessary risk situation when you don't have to?
For some reason I was surprised we are only +2 so I went back and looked. Which made me go look at prior years. 2014 was so amazing. We were +18 with 26(!!!) interceptions. We need that again.These are all good points. Our turnover margin last year was -4 on the year. We are at +2 right now.
30 million reasonsWe should have a Championship Game if we need it, i.e. if there are teams that finish with losses. If somebody runs the table, there is no reason they should have to beat somebody again to say they won the league. Dumb.
whyNote after Presser: Ty to practice at LB during these 2 weeks.
agree about adding teams and divisions. a team goes undefeated now...and the next team is 10-2 or worse, then it is pretty jacked up.We have Big 12 depth now just hope we don't have to keep using it. Even if a team goes undefeated they are still playing the Big 12 championship for the 13'th data point and to play on championship weekend like all the other conferences. The one benefit of not having two divisions is our one versus two championship match-up will be two highly ranked teams more than other conferences anyway. Bad news is runner up could easily beat the number one team and screw the Big 12 out of CFP. We really should add two teams and go to divisions.
which is all that mattered to the conference decision makers.30 million reasons