The TCU Football Jerk
Active Member
We beat OU twice. The one loss was after Stoops threw a hissy fit and had a call reversed. I think that was the same game, one of his players punched ours on the ground.
One win was before we joined the B12
We beat OU twice. The one loss was after Stoops threw a hissy fit and had a call reversed. I think that was the same game, one of his players punched ours on the ground.
If you consider 'good' from K. State on down, more power to ya. I consider our results against more than half the league as subpar at best.
I’m not sure you know what “par” means. You can look at it however you want to. I’m not trying to change your mind.
Just saying that being .500 or below vs. 66% of the conference is not good, not matter how you look at it.
So what is being .500 or above againstJust saying that being .500 or below vs. 66% of the conference is not good, not matter how you look at it.
That’s just how YOU’RE choosing to look at it. An optimist might say we’re .500 or better against 78% of the league or that we’re 38-26 against everyone but OU.
So you're saying .500 is good or okay? I guess I don't care for mediocrity.
Yes. .500 is “OK”. It’s pretty much the definition of OK.
TCU is the anti-definition of mediocrity.OK. I've got you lumped in with those that think mediocrity is okay. Check.
OK. I've got you lumped in with those that think mediocrity is okay. Check.
TCU is the anti-definition of mediocrity.
You are looking a total record over several years, not the single years in that population of data - we are a feast or famine program at its finest - we are never mediocre.
Aggy is mediocre, Tech is mediocre - always in the middle and rarely if ever above or below it. We are the opposite.
SMH..... I bet you can’t guess who I’ve got you lumped in with. Don’t worry you have lots of company.
2 is multiple - you are technically correct - but you are acting like this is the 70's and it's not.Except we're sliding into multiple years of famine. And there was no injury or youth excuse this year. Whether it be bad recruiting, poor position coaching, bad calls by the coordinators, bad special teams, this year was on the coaches. THAT is the scariest thing.
There is absolutely a youth reason for this. The quarterbacks who would have been playing - both among the top rated recruits we have ever had - didn't pan out, leaving us to start a true freshman.Except we're sliding into multiple years of famine. And there was no injury or youth excuse this year. Whether it be bad recruiting, poor position coaching, bad calls by the coordinators, bad special teams, this year was on the coaches. THAT is the scariest thing.
I’m not sure you know what “par” means. You can look at it however you want to. I’m not trying to change your mind.
2 is multiple - you are technically correct - but you are acting like this is the 70's and it's not.
being a hysterical fan is a bad look...
There is absolutely a youth reason for this. The quarterbacks who would have been playing - both among the top rated recruits we have ever had - didn't pan out, leaving us to start a true freshman.
You are absolutely right. As I have said countless times, our best play this year has been the Duggan run for his life play. Who can have success with that?Perhaps. The QB is a position that weighs heavy on wins/losses. But who know just how good or bad he is because he had absolutely ZERO blocking for him. All you have to do is rewatch the games to see that. And if you think the entire reason we didn't win this year was solely because of QB play then you don't know football.
Is he saying, "Half the people you know are below average" ?I’m not sure you know what “par” means. You can look at it however you want to. I’m not trying to change your mind.