flyfishingfrog
Active Member
so two schools that have consistently made the playoffs, one of which that has made us their [ hundin] - that is your argument.Somebody else’s rejects has worked out well for OU as of late. Blue blood Ohio State is rolling with a reject this year. Blue blood Auburn. Miami. LSU. Those are just the ones I though of in 11 seconds. Are all of their OC’s failures as well?
Fine - when Cumbie figures out how to make our offense a strength post-Boykin, who he didn't recruit but did adapt to the right system - I will agree with you that the fact that we can't recruit at the QB position and coach them up is ok.
And beyond those two - do you really want to use Auburn, Miami and LSU as your justification that it is ok to have to use constantly have to depend on transfers to be your starter?
Ensminger at LSU is in what - year 2? because Canada got run off for failing to find a QB that could play or call an offense that could move the ball despite top ranked recruits - sound familiar?
I would not exactly call Stidham a world beater at Auburn but he was far from Baylor's reject - he was their starter and we all know why he left. So yeah, if Cumbie can convince a top tier D1 QB that is going to start for one of the top offenses in the country to transfer to TCU - I will change my perspective. None of our transfers to date have been that - they have all LOST the starting job and then transferred to TCU.
Miami when 7-6 last year and it was so bad Richt retired abruptly from his Alma Mater. So that is the result you want to use to say its ok we keep doing the same thing?