But that would be too logical.Bowl ban should be for the first season for which they are eligible for a bowl. So if they don't qualify until, say, 2020, that is when the ban should be used. Otherwise, there is no point.
Self imposed one year bowl ban? Knowing Baylor they will retroactively impose this ban for the 2017 season.
I would spend so much time in their forums schadenfreuding that I would lose my job and family then die of laughter and malnourishment.They should have to vacate all victories from 2014. Their fans would spontaneously combust.
Bowl ban should be for the first season for which they are eligible for a bowl. So if they don't qualify until, say, 2020, that is when the ban should be used. Otherwise, there is no point.
They should have to vacate all victories from 2014. Their fans would spontaneously combust.
I’m not sure how quantum physics works completely but if they vacated all of Briles’ wins would that mean football was never invented in 2011? The NCAA should tread lightly here.#58-0
What a sick burn.