• The KillerFrogs

What's the future of the Iron Skillet?

TCUdirtbag

Active Member
I've always been a big supporter of the iron skillet game. I'm over it from a rivalry standpoint. Most of our fans don't care, and the players and students don't care at all.

But I think some of the "it's SMU's super bowl" talk is silly. Maybe it is, but I f we replace them with University of North Texas, Houston, Texas State, or any other G5 school, those teams are going to get up just as much to try and beat a P5 school that didn't recruit them the same way SMU does. The good thing about just playing SMU every year is we get to know their personnel and the staff isn't having to prep for an unfamiliar opponent and staff every year. That time can go to more important things.
 

Deep Purple

Full Member
But I think some of the "it's SMU's super bowl" talk is silly. Maybe it is, but I f we replace them with University of North Texas, Houston, Texas State, or any other G5 school, those teams are going to get up just as much to try and beat a P5 school that didn't recruit them the same way SMU does.
Disagree. With University of North Texas, Houston, Texas State, there is no Metroplex rivalry element, and none of them look down on Fort Worth or TCU the way Dallas/SMU does. There's a whole other dynamic involved that University of North Texas, Houston, and Texas State do not know of.
 

HeidelFrog

Active Member
Sorry, but playing academies is never a good idea. They almost always beat you up with the triple option, and sometimes they just beat you. In the MWC days, CGP had to set aside time in spring ball and fall camp to prep for it. Playing academies is cool for fans but not great for the team and the goal of winning a championship.
Loving the idea of playing Air Force is probably just a selfish wish. I would love to head out to Colorado Springs on a road trip at the Academy. Could understand why the program wouldn't want to do it. They did go undefeated and win the Rose Bowl one of the last years they played.... a MWC schedule then vs a Big 12 schedule now though
 

ShreveFrog

Full Member
Keep the game and The Skillet tradition. SMU is one hire away from building a respectable program, as we did with Fran / GP.

On that subject, I'm wondering why everyone thinks Morris is some hot coach on the move. Get back to me when they can play some defense.

No reason SMU should not at least be decent in football.
 
Last edited:

Purp

Active Member
I would say WVA. The game has always close (except last year). We both came into the conference at the same time and Morgantown has a great gameday atmosphere.
This wouldn't work bc there's no hate. I hate Baylor and hate Tech and hate SMU. Hate is what fuels a rivalry. There's a mutual respect between TCU and WVU that will make it hard to form a rivalry.
 

SuperTFrog

Active Member
They beat us 15 times in a row in the 70's and 80's. They undoubtedly were thinking the same thing during those years. The series ebbs and flows. This seems like a knee jerk reaction when you look at a 100 yr rivalry.
 

Lone Frog

Active Member
They beat us 15 times in a row in the 70's and 80's. They undoubtedly were thinking the same thing during those years. The series ebbs and flows. This seems like a knee jerk reaction when you look at a 100 yr rivalry.

Except we were in the same conference then. That's a whole different matter.
 

Riff Ram

Full Member
The home and home is a beating, and it's not worth fighting the traffic to play in their high school stadium, giving them the chance take advantage by up charging those tickets every year we go to Dallas.

Let's play them at ACS, every other year or so is plenty. We shouldn't feel obligated to do home and homes indefinitely with non P5 teams.
 
The home and home is a beating, and it's not worth fighting the traffic to play in their high school stadium, giving them the chance take advantage by up charging those tickets every year we go to Dallas.

Let's play them at ACS, every other year or so is plenty. We shouldn't feel obligated to do home and homes indefinitely with non P5 teams.

I bought tickets on Stubhub at the 30 for $15 last time.
 

TCUdirtbag

Active Member
Disagree. With University of North Texas, Houston, Texas State, there is no Metroplex rivalry element, and none of them look down on Fort Worth or TCU the way Dallas/SMU does. There's a whole other dynamic involved that University of North Texas, Houston, and Texas State do not know of.

IMO you're confusing emotions/attitudes of people 35+ with those of college football players who were born after the SWC broke up, who have never seen SMU ever being good, and who have never not seen TCU be good. It's not 1995, 2000 or even 2010. Today's players have a very different perspective of TCU and SMU than existed pre-2000. The "dynamic" you speak of doesn't exist as it once did.
 
Last edited:

TCUdirtbag

Active Member
No reason SMU should not at least be decent in football.

There are many reasons SMU is not decent in football:
- Inadequate facilities
- No fan support
- 30 years of being awful

This doesn't touch many other issues that hold them back, from (supposedly) higher academic standards limiting who they'll recruit, to the challenges TCU has faced being a small private school in a pro sports city in a state with huge public school fan bases.
 

rifram09

Active Member
It is what it is. We play one good (or okay) OOC game, our "rivalry" against SMew, and one game complete body bag game against an FCS school.

If you believe the OOC should be improved, dropping the FCS game makes the most sense. Changing SMew with a rotation of other G5 teams doesn't improve the schedule, and only served to end a century-long, regional rivalry. I guess I'd be okay with dropping SMew if we replaced them with another P5 game. But I'd still rather keep SMew, and schedule two P5 games.
 
Top