Hey - others may bash you...imagine that, but your estimate looks as a definite possible to me.steelfrog said:2 aready KU, KSU, ISU, WVU and UT. That's 7. Not great but Steel will take it this year. Tack on a win between OU, OSU and BU and 8 would be dang good.
You're wrong 99 percent of the timesteelfrog said:2 aready KU, KSU, ISU, WVU and UT. That's 7. Not great but Steel will take it this year. Tack on a win between OU, OSU and BU and 8 would be dang good.
Delray Frog said:I think 7 wins is a best case scenario this year. Next year will be our year to contend.
Delray Frog said:I think 7 wins is a best case scenario this year. Next year will be our year to contend.
Sorry, no.steelfrog said:2 aready KU, KSU, ISU, WVU and UT. That's 7. Not great but Steel will take it this year. Tack on a win between OU, OSU and BU and 8 would be dang good.
I don't agree with the bolded part. Apparently he was about to go in. I think the coaches are trying to salvage the experience Boykin attained and not just "yank" him prematurely. Even still, they almost yanked him against Smoo.Dman890 said:Everyone keeps saying that. But who's is going to be our QB next year?
Do we think Boykin year 3 is it?
They haven't shown any faith in Matthews which means he must not have it. 2 good ones coming in next year, but will they be ready as true freshman?
I think we may still be a few years away from "contending".
Are you a troll?Power of Purple said:
Sorry, no.