The way I see it, UT already has the resources and facilities. They already recruit at a high level no matter how good or bad their program is.
The problem they have are the coaches. No AD can fix that. Will the players all of a sudden play better because of a new AD?
The problem at UT isn't the coaches; it's the boosters that think they get unfettered access to the programs. Strong didn't stop being a good coach when he left Louisville and then suddenly became a good coach again when he went to USF. It's the culture and the responsibilities that don't relate to on-field performance that do the coaches in.
CDC's biggest job at Texas is to be responsive enough to donors that he can get away with limiting access to the coaches and teams. Then the coaches can coach. CDC is the kind of guy who can make the big-money crybabies happy even as he's taking away their toy.
He'll get the donors to refocus on what they can give to the student-athletes, not what kind of quid pro quo they can negotiate. That's a simple job but it's a culture change, and there aren't many who can steer a ship as big as UT through something like that.
He'll do very well for UT. I hope he'll do so while limiting actions that directly harm TCU. Jeremiah getting the gig makes that more likely, I think. He's in CDC's "AD tree" and I bet CDC wants to be remembered as a guy who developed others into successful ADs.